Application of the Typological Approach in the Educational Space of the Higher School
Research Article


- Published in:
- International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 5
- Author:
- Elena M. Lysenko 1
- Work direction:
- Pedagogy and Modern Education
- Pages:
- 15-24
- Received: 16 February 2022 / Accepted: 30 March 2022 / Published: 30 March 2022
- Rating:
- Article accesses:
- 1940
- Published in:
- doaj РИНЦ
UDC 159.9+378
DOI: 10.31483/r-101106
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to generalize the ideas of teachers, psychologists, sociologists and acmeologists about the typological approach to students in the educational space of higher education. When writing the work, the tasks of systematizing existing students and building their own typology of students were solved based on the generalization of personality types, learning opportunities, styles of learning activities, the leading representative system and other criteria for identifying student typologies for the implementation of educational, educational and developmental activities of the university.
The following scientific methods were used in the work: methods of analysis and synthesis, generalization and systematization, and the modeling method.
The article shows that the typological approach is applicable for identifying and describing the main types characteristic of the subjects of the educational process on the scale of higher education. Particular attention is paid to the mechanisms for the development and application of the typological approach and the possibilities on its basis to organize productive interaction between the teacher and the student, taking into account the strengths of the individual, the levels of actual development and the areas of immediate development of students. It is shown that the resource capabilities of the identified personality types of trainees are actualized with the help of a master teacher, who applies individual, differentiated and personality-oriented approaches to future professionals in the course of their professional and personal development in the cycles of readable disciplines and in the system of educational activities of the university.
The result of the study was the development of a comparative table of methods for typology of students (taking into account psychological-pedagogical and acme-oriented approaches and criteria for identifying typological groups) and their consideration in the organization of the educational process in higher education. The table systematizes the views of psychologists, sociologists, teachers and acmeologists on the educational process at the university over the past few decades and demonstrates the best ways for the educational activities of students.
Keywords
References
- 1. Akimova, Iu. N. (2007). Tipy lichnosti studentov v sovremennykh usloviiakh vysshego obrazovaniia Rossii., 22. Iaroslavl'.
- 2. Aliev, N. N. (1992). Vybor osobennostei uchashchikhsia pri differentsirovannom obuchenii inostrannomu iazyku. Inostrannyi iazyk v shkole, 5, 28-29.
- 3. Babanskii, Iu. K., Filonov, G. N., Pobedonostsev, G. A., & Akad, A. M. (1989). Izbrannye pedagogicheskie trudy., 558. Babanskii;; Moiseev;; Moiseev;; M.: Pedagogika.
- 4. Delor, Zh. Obrazovanie: sokrytoe sokrovishche: Osnovnye polozheniia Doklada Mezhdunarodnoi komissii po obrazovaniiu dlia XXI veka (Learning: The Treasure Within). Retrieved from URL: http://www.ifap.ru/library/book201.pdf
- 5. Ionina, O. S. (2015). Proiavleniia individual'nogo stilia uchebno-professional'noi deiatel'nosti studenta. Kontsept, Spetsvypusk 12. Retrieved from URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2015/75186.htm
- 6. Kukharchuk, A. M., & Tsentsiper, A. B. (1976). Professional'noe samoopredelenie uchashchikhsia., 128. Minsk: Narodnaia asveta.
- 7. Lisovskii, V. T. (1990). Sovetskoe studenchestvo. Sotsiologicheskie ocherki., 304. M.: Vysshaia shkola.
- 8. Lysenko, E. M. (1998). Differentsirovannoe obuchenie studentov v usloviiakh lichnostno-orientirovannogo obrazovaniia., 22. Saratov.
- 9. Mazii, B. K. K voprosu o potrebnostiakh i ikh roli v sisteme otnoshenii cheloveka. Uchenye zapiski Leningr.gos.un-ta. -1959, 265, 86-115.
- 10. Merlin, B. C. (1986). Ocherki integral'nogo issledovaniia individual'nosti., 256. M.: Pedagogika.
- 11. Savenkov, A. I. (2019). Pedagogika. Issledovatel'skii podkhod v 2 ch. Chast' 1. Uchebnik i praktikum dlia akademicheskogo bakalavriata. Uchebnik., 232. M.: Iurait.
- 12. Savratskaia, E. Iu., & Lysenko, E. M. (2021). Samoosushchestvlenie tvorcheskoi unikal'nosti lichnosti: metodologicheskie i aksiologicheskie problemy nauchno-tekhnicheskogo tvorchestva. Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii, 103-110. Sankt-Peterburg.
- 13. Selivanova, R. G. (1987). Rol' kuratora v formirovanii u studentov individual'nogo stilia uchebnoi raboty. Problemy obucheniia v vuze, 70-78. Saratov: Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta.
- 14. Lysenko, E. M. (2015). Slovar'-spravochnik po kul'ture zhizni. Kniga 4. Seriia "Budushchee Rossii: obrazovanie, preobrazovanie, protsvetanie"., 248. Saratov: Saratovskii istochnik.
- 15. Shevchenko, G. I. Formirovanie strategii uspeshnoi uchebnoi deiatel'nosti cherez razvitie reprezentatsii. Retrieved from URL: http://www.dissercat.com/content/formirovanie-strategii-uspeshnoi-uchebnoi-deyatelnosti-cherez-razvitie-reprezentatsii
Comments(0)