On the Structure of the Beserman Dictionary Based on the Materials of T. I. Teplyashina

Research Article
EDN: GOGYHY DOI: 10.31483/r-103143
Open Access
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 4
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 4
Author:
Sergey A. Maksimov 1
Work direction:
World languages and literature
Pages:
23-30
Received: 7 August 2022 / Accepted: 27 September 2022 / Published: 29 September 2022

Rating:
Article accesses:
2087
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Udmurt Federal Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
For citation:
Maksimov S. A. (2022). On the Structure of the Beserman Dictionary Based on the Materials of T. I. Teplyashina. Ethnic Culture, 4(3), 23-30. EDN: GOGYHY. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-103143
UDC 811.511.131

Abstract

This work is devoted to description of the microstructure (dictionary entry) of the Beserman dictionary, which is compiled based on the materials of T. I. Teplyashina. Besermans are small people who live compactly in the North West of Udmurtia. From the point of view of linguistics they speak a special dialect of the Udmurt language. The Besermans have a stable ethnic and linguistic identity, which is different from the Udmurt. At the beginning of the 21st century, the language of Besermans has become an object of considerable interest for linguists. Field materials were embodied in two dictionaries, a monograph and scientific articles. The most significant contribution to the study of the Beserman dialect was made by T. I. Teplyashina, who published the monograph “The Language of the Besermans”. Most of her materials, which were systematized in a field file, remained unused. The scientist's field file representing the Beserman speech of speakers born in the century before last can be called a unique linguistic heritage, waiting to be processed and implemented as a dictionary. Our dictionary will contain lexical and textual materials published in monographs and previously unpublished. This article examines in detail the structure of the dictionary, which has no analogues, at least in the lexicography of the Ural-Volga region.

References

  1. 1. Alatyrev, V. I. (1988). Etimologicheskii slovar' udmurtskogo iazyka: bukvy A, B, 240. Izhevsk.
  2. 2. Atamanov-Egrapi, M. G. (2010). Proiskhozhdenie udmurtskogo naroda : monografiia, 576. Izhevsk : Udmurtiia.
  3. 3. Grishkina, M. V., & Vladykin, V. E. (1982). Pis'mennye istochniki po istorii udmurtov IX-XVII vv. Materialy po etnogenezu udmurtov, 3-42. Izhevsk.
  4. 4. Karpova, L. L. (2013). Leksika severnogo narechiia udmurtskogo iazyka: srednechepetskiy dialekt. Izhevsk.
  5. 5. Kel'makov, V. K. (2003). Dialektnaia i istoricheskaia fonetika udmurtskogo iazyka. Chast' 1, 276. Izhevsk: Izdatel'skii dom "Udmurtskii universitet".
  6. 6. Kel'makov, V. K. (2004). Dialektnaia i istoricheskaia fonetika udmurtskogo iazyka. Chast' 2, 395. Izhevsk: Izdatel'skii dom "Udmurtskii universitet".
  7. 7. Kel'makov, V. K. (1992). K opisatel'noi i istoricheskoi fonetike besermianskogo narechiia. Kel'makov V. K. Problemy sovremennoi udmurtskoi dialektologii v issledovaniiakh i materialakh, 33-107. Izhevsk: Izdatel'stvo Udmurtskogo universiteta.
  8. 8. Kel'makov, V. K. (2009). T. I. Tepliashina i sovremennoe udmurtskoe iazykoznanie, 34. Izhevsk: Izdatel'skii dom "Udmurtskii universitet".
  9. 9. Kel'makov, V. K. (2009). T. I. Tepliashinoi 80. Permistika, 10: Voprosy permskoy i finno-ugorskoy filologii, 11-41. Izhevsk.
  10. 10. Luppov, P. N. (1997). O besermianakh. O besermianakh : sbornik statei, 19-49. Izhevsk.
  11. 11. Liukina, N. M. (2016). Fonetiko-morfologicheskie osobennosti iazyka lekminskikh i iundinskikh besermian: monografiia, 200. Izhevsk: Institut komp'iuternykh issledovanii.
  12. 12. Maksimov, S. A. (2009). Kommentarii k karte "Kapusta". Nasibullin R. Sh., Maksimov S. A., Semenov V. G., Busygina L. V., Otstavnova G. V. Dialektologicheskii atlas udmurtskogo iazyka, Vypusk 1. Izhevsk: NITs "Reguliarnaia i khaoticheskaia dinamika".
  13. 13. Napol'skikh, V. V. (2015). Ocherki po etnicheskoi istorii, 646. Kazan'.
  14. 14. Napol'skikh, V. V. (1997). "Biserminy". O besermianakh : sbornik statei, 50-54. Izhevsk.
  15. 15. Nasibullin, R. Sh., Maksimov, S. A., Semenov, V. G., & Busygina, L. V. (2013). Dialektologicheskii atlas udmurtskogo iazyka : karty i kommentarii, Vypusk 3, 302. Izhevsk : NITs "Reguliarnaia i khaoticheskaia dinamika".
  16. 16. Nasibullin, R. Sh., Maksimov, S. A., Semenov, V. G., Busygina, L. V., & Arzamazova, O. A. (2015). Dialektologicheskii atlas udmurtskogo iazyka : karty i kommentarii. Izhevsk : NITs "Reguliarnaia i khaoticheskaia dinamika", Vypusk 5, 256.
  17. 17. Popova, E. V. (2004). Kalendarnye obriady besermian, 253. Izhevsk.
  18. 18. Popova, E. V. (2011). Kul'tovye pamiatniki i sakral'nye obekty besermian : monografiia, 320. Izhevsk.
  19. 19. Popova, E. V. (1998). Semeinye obychai i obriady besermian (konets XIX – 90-e gody XX vv.), 241. Izhevsk.
  20. 20. Savelyev, A. V. (2021). A pre-standard Chuvash text with a dative-accusative distinction. Ural-Altaic stadies, 1, 77-100.
  21. 21. Kuznetsova, I., Serdobol'skaia, N. V., Usacheva, M. N., Biriuk, O. L., & Idrisov, R. I. (2013). Slovar' besermianskogo dialekta udmurtskogo iazyka., 540. Moskva: TEZAURUS.
  22. 22. (1977). Slovar' russkikh narodnykh govorov, Vypusk 12. Filin ; Sorokoletov ; AN SSSR ; Leningrad: Nauka.
  23. 23. Tarakanov, I. V. (1993). Udmurtsko-tiurkskie iazykovye vzaimosviazi: teoriia i slovar', 170. Izhevsk : Izdatel'stvo Udmurtskogo universiteta.
  24. 24. Usacheva, M. N. (2017). Tezaurus besermianskogo narechiia : I=imena i sluzhebnye chasti rechi (govor derevni Shamardan), 540. Moskva: Izdatel'skie resheniia.
  25. 25. Tepliashina, T. I. (1970). Iazyk besermian, 288. AN SSSR. Moskva: Nauka.
  26. 26. Fedotov, M. R. (1996). Etimologicheskii slovar' chuvashskogo iazyka.
  27. 27. Ekhmet'yanov R. G. (2015). Tatar telenen etimologik sүzlege : ike tomda. Kazan : Mәgarif-Vakyt.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.