Moral and environmental education as an indicator of the quality of education

Research Article
EDN: FZZIXF DOI: 10.31483/r-108399
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 6
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 6
Authors:
Svetlana V. Sokolovskaia 1 , Svetlana V. Afinogenova 1
Work direction:
Psychology in Education
Pages:
89-95
Received: 23 October 2023 / Accepted: 19 November 2023 / Published: 27 December 2023

Rating:
Article accesses:
1691
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
For citation:
Sokolovskaia S. V., & Afinogenova S. V. (2023). Moral and environmental education as an indicator of the quality of education. Development of education, 6(4), 89-95. EDN: FZZIXF. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-108399
UDC 159.99

Abstract

The article considers the concept of isomorphism of the quality of the educational process and the quality of its result − the education/upbringing of the Student's personality from the position of ecologization of his consciousness and behavior. The relevance of this approach has been confirmed by many researchers of the scientific school of noospherism. The purpose of the research presented in the article was to establish the relationship between the value-moral-spiritual characteristics of a person and such parameters of her moral and ecological consciousness as: the level of subjectivization of natural objects; the personal orientation of the motivation of the attitude to nature in the aggregate of cognitive, aesthetic, pragmatic-consumer (deficient) and spiritual-moral attitudes. The study was conducted using diagnostic methods of value-moral-spiritual orientations of the individual, subjectivization of the natural object, the dominant orientation of the individual in relation to nature, egocentric associations and correlation analysis (according to Pearson) of the individual results of the study obtained in the diagnosis. The subjects were 75 high school and first-year students. The authors revealed the dominant aesthetic and cognitive attitude of boys and girls to nature, the pragmatic-consumer attitude took the last place, which indicates good prospects for greening the educational process and achieving high quality moral and ecological education of Students in it.

References

  1. 1. Abydenova, N. A. (2008). Psikhologicheskie mekhanizmy formirovaniia lichnostnoi znachimosti., 216. Nizhnii Novgorod. EDN: NQDHDR.
  2. 2. Aleksandrova, E. S. (2021). Interrelation of personal values of an individual and pro-environmental behavior in conditions of increasing anthropogenic load on the environment. Voprosy ustoichivogo razvitiia obshchestva, 10, 328-338. EDN: TJLQXK. https://doi.org/10.34755/IROK.2021.27.75.009
  3. 3. Gorbachev, A. L. (2009). Psikhologicheskie usloviia i mekhanizmy dukhovno-nravstvennogo razvitiia lichnosti., 210. Nizhnii Novgorod. EDN: NQPFQT.
  4. 4. Irgit, E. L., & Erenchin, D. O. (2019). On the issue of ecological consciousness of students. Vestnik Tuvinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3(51), 28-34. EDN: IKMMFM. https://doi.org/10.24411/2221-0458-2019-10013
  5. 5. Linenko, O. A. (2016). Ekologizatsiia soznaniia v kontekste kul'turologicheskogo podkhoda i kontseptsii ekotselostnoi lichnosti. Materialy IV ezhegodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii "Aktual'nye problemy neftegazovoi otrasli Severo-Kavkazskogo federal'nogo okruga", 197-202. EDN: XVFBQN.
  6. 6. Panov, V. I. (2020). Ecological Psychology: Directions and Trends. Ecopoiesis: Eco-Human Theory and Practice, 1, 36-44. EDN: MWGNLA.
  7. 7. Panov, V. I. (2020). Ecological Psychology: Problems and Directions. The World of Psychology, 2(102), 144--154. EDN: KGXECY. https://doi.org/10.51944/2073-8528_2020_2_144
  8. 8. Ponomarenko, V. A. (2012). Psikhologiia dukhovnosti professionala., 256. M.: Per Se. EDN: RAYWVF.
  9. 9. Sautkina, E. V., Agisova, F. B., Ivande, K. S., & Kabanova, V. S. (2022). Pro-environmental behaviour in Russia. A systematic review. Experimental Psychology (Russia), 15(2), 172-193. EDN: LOWNEP. https://doi.org/10.17759/exppsy.2022150213
  10. 10. Sdobniakov, V. V. (2020). Ecology of nature, ecology of the spirit - inextricable concepts in russian culture. Ekologiia i razvitie obshchestva, 1 (32), 51-53. EDN: PQWVSJ.
  11. 11. Smirnov, G. S., & Smirnov, D. G. (2022). "Chelovek i noosfera": razvitie akademicheskoi traditsii v XX veke. Mif. Obshchestvo. Real'nost', 42-58. EDN: GUTVMS.
  12. 12. Subetto, A. I. (2015). Sotsial'noe kachestvo zhizni: kategoriia i osnovy stanovleniia teorii. Ekonomika kachestva, 1 (19), 2-16. EDN: UUXPQZ.
  13. 13. Tikhomirov, D. A. (2018). Ecological Consciousness of Moscow Youth. The horizons of humanities knowledge, 2, 65-73. EDN: XUOKCL. https://doi.org/10.17805/ggz.2018.2.6
  14. 14. Khusainov, Z. A. (2015). Ekologicheskoe myshlenie i ekologicheskoe soznanie - osnova formirovaniia ekologicheskoi kul'tury molodogo pokoleniia. Evraziiskii soiuz uchenykh, 3-1 (12), 62-64. EDN: XDSRIP.
  15. 15. Tsvetkova, I. V., & Ivanova, T. N. (2020). Social Criteria of Young People’s Environmental Responsibility. Integration of Education, 21(4), 723-735. EDN: ZVLHNR. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.089.021.201704.723-735
  16. 16. Iasvin, V. A. (2013). Environmental Psychology of Education as a Direction of Psychological and Pedagogical Science. MCU Journal of Pedagogy and Psychology, 4, 42-49. EDN: RSBHCT.
  17. 17. Aegissova, F., & Sautkina, E. (2020). The Role of Personal and Political Values in Predicting Environmental Attitudes and Pro-environmental Behavior in Kazakhstan. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 584292. EDN: YSHPFD. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584292
  18. 18. Chan, H. W. (2019). When do values promote pro-environmental behaviors? Multilevel evidence on the self-expression hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 65, 101361. EDN: NXMFTJ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101361
  19. 19. Guslyakova, A. V., Guslyakova, N. I., & Valeeva, N. G. (2020). Ecological consciousness of the XXI century human and the ways of its verbalization in the media discourse environment. RUDN Journal of Ecology and Life Safety, 28(4), 370-380. EDN: XLZHVT. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2310-2020-28-4-370-380

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.