En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Journal "Ethnic culture"
  3. Vol 6, No 1
  4. The question of the syntactic status of substantiv...

The question of the syntactic status of substantives in Russian identity sentences

Research Article
EDN: LPPJIK DOI: 10.31483/r-110159
Open Access
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 6
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 6
Author:
Natalia V. Knyazeva 1
Work direction:
World languages and literature
Pages:
13-19
Received: 17 February 2024 / Accepted: 23 March 2024 / Published: 26 March 2024

Rating:
Article accesses:
1277
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Pacific National University
For citation:
Knyazeva N. V. (2024). The question of the syntactic status of substantives in Russian identity sentences. Ethnic Culture, 6(1), 13-19. EDN: LPPJIK. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-110159
UDC 372.881.161.1

Abstract

A multi aspect study of bisubstantive sentences of characterizing semantics is necessary to solve complex problems of syntactic analysis. The grammatical specificity of bisubstantial sentences lies in the morphological identity of the predicative minimum. The study has theoretical and practical tasks: identify the structural, semantic and communicative organization of sentences, propose methodological recommendations for syntactic analysis of sentences. The material of the study is modern literature. Analytical and descriptive methods are used to analyze the linguistic material. The problems of teaching syntactic analysis of sentences are identified through experimental methods. The main conclusions of the study: syntactic analysis of bisubstantial sentences should consist of traditional structural and semantic parameters, roles and functions in the semantic structure and communicative organization of a sentence, take into account context, stylistic and pragmatic factors. Syntactic phenomena should be studied from the functional position at all stages and levels of teaching syntax of the modern Russian language.

References

  1. 1. Gerasimova, A. A. (2022). Towards the classification of russian binominative clauses. Rhema, 2, 32-66. EDN: UOUVGK. https://doi.org/10.31862/2500-2953-2022-2-32-66
  2. 2. Iosilevich, N. V. (2014). On the structural and semantic features of two-part sentences. Humanities, socio-economic and social sciences, 10-2, 162-165. EDN: SXICEJ.
  3. 3. Koniashkin, A. M. (2020). The predicate in biinfinitive sentences. The world of science, culture and education, 6(85), 513-515. EDN: IUWGLL. https://doi.org/10.24412/1991-5500-2020-685-513-515
  4. 4. Korneva, V. V. (2020). Infinitive sentences in the russian and spanish languages. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, 1, 51-60. EDN: CJQZLG. https://doi.org/10.17308/lic.2020.1/2730
  5. 5. Prianikov, A. V. (2012). Substantive predicates in the modern Russian language: Semantic aspect. The world of science, culture and education, 3(34), 397-399. EDN: PCHZFP.
  6. 6. Fedorova, Iu. A. (2022). Syntactic function of an infinitive in an infinitive-substantive sentence. Bulletin of Moscow Region State University. Series: Russian Philology, 5, 42-48. EDN: QNAMJY. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7278-2022-5-42-48
  7. 7. Shakhmatov, A. A. (2014). Russian language syntax., 720. Moscow: Flinta; Moscow: Nauka.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.