En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Journal "Ethnic culture"
  3. Vol 6, No 2
  4. National Specificity of German Secondary Nominatio...

National Specificity of German Secondary Nominations with Zoonyms Schwein or Sau in Their Composition

Research Article
EDN: TXKJSA DOI: 10.31483/r-112217
Open Access
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 6
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 6
Author:
Yuriy A. Vorobyev 1
Work direction:
World languages and literature
Pages:
30-35
Received: 8 June 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 26 June 2024

Rating:
Article accesses:
902
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Academy of Law Management of the Federal Penal Service of Russia
For citation:
Vorobyev Y. A. (2024). National Specificity of German Secondary Nominations with Zoonyms Schwein or Sau in Their Composition. Ethnic Culture, 6(2), 30-35. EDN: TXKJSA. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-112217
UDC 811.112.2’373.2

Abstract

The article presents the results of the analysis of German secondary nominations with Schwein or Sau zoonyms. The aim of the analysis was to identify common and nationally specific features of these nominations against the background of their Russian equivalents. The relevance of this study is due to the need for a comprehensive study of secondary nominations, taking into account their axiological aspects, which have a certain cultural uniqueness and cause nationally unique semantic transformations in the lexical meaning of these units. The study used the methods of descriptive, comparative-comparative, component analysis, the method of critical dictionary analysis and dictionary definitions. These methods allowed us to conclude that the nominative potential of the secondary meanings of the German zoonym Schwein or Sau is more pronounced in comparison with their Russian equivalents. The analysis also showed a wider evaluative spectrum of German units and a greater variability of the axiological component in their lexical meaning both under the influence of the contextual environment and without it. Secondary nominations with the indicated zoonyms in their composition were selected as the main material of the study, identified by means of a continuous sampling from German explanatory, encyclopedic, phraseological and linguocultural dictionaries, German language resources, as well as German-Russian dictionaries.

References

  1. 1. Artamonov, V. N., Uba, E. V. (2020). Linguistic analysis of the text. Evaluation category. Bulletin of Moscow State Region University. Series: Russian Philology, 2, 6–12. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7278-2020-2-6-12. EDN: LZIUWV.
  2. 2. Galimullina, R. I. (2021). Cognitive-semantic analysis of structure of paroemias with component-zoonym in the Tatar, Russian and English languages. Philology. Theory & Practice, 14(8), 2602–2606. https://doi.org/10.30853/phil210388. EDN: CCWUXP.
  3. 3. Zhura, V. V., Rudova, Y. V., Semenova, E. G. (2021). Secondary somatic nominations in media texts covering economy, business and politics spheres. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 20(5), 153–156. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2021.5.12. EDN: ZSBHBS
  4. 4. Lavrishcheva, E. V., Abroskina, N. B. (2020). Representation of the social sphere in the german and english language picture of the world (on the material of phraseologiсal units with zoonym component). Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice. Series: Humanities, 11-2, 68–69. https://doi.org/10.37882/2223-2982.2020.11-2.11. EDN: LGDDMN.
  5. 5. Merzlikina, O. V. (2021). Zoomorphic metaphors “livestock” in Russian and Galician language pictures of the world. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 71, 114–132. https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/71/7. EDN: ROHDGM.
  6. 6. Mosina, N. M. (2022). Comparative analysis of phraseological units with the component-zoonym “domestic animals” in Mordovian and Finnish languages. Ethnic Culture, 4(3), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-103508. EDN: GWKNIL.
  7. 7. Nefedov, S. T. (2022). The language of evaluation: what the evaluation says about the evaluator. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Language and Literature, 19(4), 821–838. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu09.2022.410. EDN: COYTHT.
  8. 8. Timerkhanov, A. A., Galimova, O. N. (2020). Arabic and Persian borrowings in the tatar language in diachronic and synchronic aspects (based on zoonyms). Philology and Culture, 1, 105–112. https://doi.org/10.26907/2074-0239-2020-59-1-105-112. EDN: ZYYRTK.
  9. 9. Hutyz, I. P., Petrenko, Y. A. (2021). Discursive categories of evaluation and dialogicality in academic discourse. I. Y. Yakovlev Chuvash State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 3(112), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.37972/chgpu.2021.112.3.015. EDN: ZIQTIT.
  10. 10. Baranov, A., Dobrovolsky, D. (2023). Principles of describing obscene idioms. Russian Linguistics. 2023, 47(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11185-022-09266-5. EDN: XIJMCY.
  11. 11. Belova, E. E., Arkhipova, M. V., Gavrikova, Y. A., Mineeva, O. A., Nikolskaya, T. E., Zhernovaya, O. R. (2021). The Linguistic Cultural Analysis of Phraseological Units with the Zoonym Component. The European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 158–164.
  12. 12. Riegler, R. (2019). The animal in the mirror of language: A contribution to the comparative theory of meaning., 316. Dresden; Leipzig: Vero Verlag.
  13. 13. Uralova, O. P. (2024). The Function of a Zoonym in English and Russian Phraseology. American Journal of Language, Literacy and Learning in STEM Education, 2, 292–295.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.