En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Journal "Development of education"
  3. No 2 (4)
  4. Assessment of employers' satisfaction with educati...

Assessment of employers' satisfaction with educational activities of the university in the framework of internal self-assessment of the university in accordance with the gef in 3++

Research Article
EDN: DYPFUJ DOI: 10.31483/r-32496
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education»
Author:
Valentina N. Novikova 1
Work direction:
Practice
Pages:
94-98
Received: 8 April 2019

Rating:
Article accesses:
4867
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 FSBEI of HE "St. Petersburg mining University"
For citation:
Novikova V. N. (2019). Assessment of employers' satisfaction with educational activities of the university in the framework of internal self-assessment of the university in accordance with the gef in 3++. Development of education, 94-98. EDN: DYPFUJ. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-32496
UDC 658.512

Abstract

The article presents the procedure of evaluation of satisfaction of employers as a mechanism for assessing the quality of educational activities and results of the University education within the framework of the system of internal assessment in accordance with the GEF IN the 3++. Unified requirements for the organization of assessment of employers' satisfaction with educational activities of the University and the implementation of feedback with them are established.

References

  1. 1. Zakon Rossiiskoi Federatsii "Ob obrazovanii" ot 29 dekabria 2012 g. N 273-FZ s izmeneniiami i dopolneniiami. Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru/docu-ment/cons_doc_LAW_140174/
  2. 2. FGOS VO 3++ (portal Federal'nykh gosudarstvennykh obrazovatel'nykh standartov vysshego obrazovaniia). Retrieved from http://fgosvo.ru/fgo-svo/152/150/25/48
  3. 3. Prikaz Minobrnauki Rossii ot 12.09.2013 N 1061 "Ob utverzhdenii perechnei spetsial'nostei i napravlenii podgotovki vysshego obrazovaniia". Retrieved from https://rg.ru/2013/11/01/obr-napravlenia-dok.html
  4. 4. Prikaz Minobrnauki Rossii ot 05.04.2017 N 301 "Ob utverzhdenii Poriadka organizatsii i osushchestvleniia obrazovatel'noi deiatel'nosti po obrazovatel'nym programmam vysshego obrazovaniia - programmam bakalavriata, programmam spetsialiteta, programmam magistratury". Retrieved from https://normativ.kontur.ru/do-cument?moduleId=1&documentId=-297688
  5. 5. Minobrnauki Rossii ot 17.08.2017 N 05-15120 "Ob izmeneniiakh normativnogo pravovogo regulirovaniia organizatsii i osushchestvleniia obrazovatel'noi deiatel'nosti po obrazovatel'nym programmam vysshego obrazovaniia". Retrieved from http://www.consultant.ru/document/-cons_doc_LAW_223169/
  6. 6. Prikaz Minobrnauki Rossii ot 13.07.2017 N 653 "O vnesenii izmenenii v federal'nye gosudarstvennye obrazovatel'nye standarty vysshego obrazovaniia". Retrieved from https://normativ.kon-tur.ru/document?moduleId=1&documentId=-298451
  7. 7. GOST R ISO 9001-2015 Sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva. Trebovaniia. Natsional'nyi standart Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Sistema menedzhmenta kachestva. Quality management systems. Requirements. Data vvedeniia 2015-11-01 M.: Standartinform, 2018. Retrieved from http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200124394
  8. 8. GOST R ISO 9000-2015 Sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva. Osnovnye polozheniia i slovar' (s Popravkoi) Data vvedeniia 2015-11-01 M.: Standartinform, 2018. Retrieved from http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200124393
  9. 9. GOST R ISO 10005-2007 Menedzhment organizatsii. Rukovodiashchie ukazaniia po planirovaniiu kachestva. M.: Standartinform, 2009. Retrieved from http://docs.cntd.ru/document/1200062243
  10. 10. GOST R ISO 10001-2009 Menedzhment kachestva. Udovletvorennost' potrebitelei. Rekomendatsii po pravilam povedeniia dlia organizatsii. M.: Standartinform, 2018. Retrieved from http://docs.cntd.ru/document/gost-r-iso-10001-2009
  11. 11. (2012). GOST R 54732- 2011. M.: Standartinform. Retrieved from http://docs.cntd.ru/document/gost-r-54732-2011

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.