Distance Learning of Students: Problems and Prospects of Its Development After the Coronavirus Pandemic

Research Article
EDN: PATSFB DOI: 10.31483/r-75354
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education»
Author:
Aleksandr A. Kiselev 1
Work direction:
Discourse
Pages:
97-100
Received: 16 April 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
5344
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 ФГБОУ ВО «Ярославский государственный технический университет»
For citation:
Kiselev A. A. (2020). Distance Learning of Students: Problems and Prospects of Its Development After the Coronavirus Pandemic. Development of education, 97-100. EDN: PATSFB. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-75354
UDC 378.14

Abstract

The article is devoted to generalization of the first experience of mass distance learning received in the conditions of the coronavirus pandemic. The author of the article points out that a lot of debates in domestic universities about organizing distance learning for students, when diametrically opposed points of view were expressed about its effectiveness and inefficiency, necessity and uselessness, etc. could be observed. It is noted that in the context of the coronavirus pandemic, domestic universities had to switch to using distance learning methods when teaching students. Research methods: reviews and articles of teachers and university specialists on the first results of the organization of distance learning for students in domestic universities in the conditions of the coronavirus pandemic as well as the method of participatory observation and conversations with university lecturers. Results of research. The majority of Russian universities were not ready for such a simultaneous and complete transition to distance learning. This is due to the fact that neither teachers nor students were prepared for such a critical situation, which had never been before and was not supposed to be. Nevertheless, teachers and students since the beginning of the crisis have established communications by their usual means using social networks and e-mail. The transition to information platforms, which were created at the university to control the learning process, led to new problems, as it was necessary to restructure the work of both teachers and students, increasing the tension of their work, often without the possibility of obtaining technical support for the transition to new platforms.

References

  1. 1. Kiselev, A. A. (2019). Aktivnye metody obucheniia v usloviiakh "tsifrovizatsii": problemy i puti ikh resheniia. Development and dissemenation of best practices in the field of digital skills development in an educational organization, 65-68. Cheboksary: PH "Sreda".
  2. 2. Kiselev, A. A. (2019). Metodicheskie podkhody k organizatsii on-lain obucheniia v otechestvennykh vuzakh: problemy i puti ikh resheniia. The Electronic Scientific Journal, 7 (27), 22-27.
  3. 3. Kiselev, A. A. (2019). On-Line Training as a Problem of Modern Higher Education. Rossiiskii universitet v neustoichivom mire: global'nye vyzovy i natsional'nye otvety, 182-187. Ivanovo: Ivan. gos. un-t.
  4. 4. Kiselev, A. A. (2020). Pedagog v rossiiskikh vuzakh bez professional'nogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniia: norma ili problema dlia povysheniia kachestva vysshego obrazovaniia. Pedagogy, Psychology, Society, 70-74. Cheboksary: PH "Sreda".
  5. 5. Kiselev, A. A. (2019). On-lain-obuchenie: perspektivy i problemy v sovremennom vysshem obrazovanii v podgotovke professional'nykh kadrov dlia otechestvennykh organizatsii. Aktual'nye voprosy razvitiia natsional'noi ekonomiki, 744-751. Perm'.
  6. 6. Mel'nik, D. Karantin kak povod peresmotret' podkhod k vysshemu obrazovaniiu. Retrieved from https://tass.ru/opinions/8028493
  7. 7. Vuzy derzhat distantsiiu: kak koronavirus povliiaet na rossiiskoe vysshee obrazovanie. Retrieved from https://news.rambler.ru/education/43852717-vuzy-derzhat-distantsiyu-kak-koronavirus-povliyaet-na-rossiyskoe-vysshee-obrazovanie/

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.