Women’s Worldview of the Writer or the Aesthetic World of Literature (Reflections on the Term “Women’s Prose”)
Research Article


- Published in:
- International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 5
- Author:
- Albina F. Myshkina 1
- Work direction:
- Special theme of the issue
- Pages:
- 10-14
- Received: 2 February 2022 / Accepted: 24 February 2022 / Published: 30 March 2022
- Rating:
- Article accesses:
- 2131
- Published in:
- doaj РИНЦ
1 Chuvash State Institute of Humanities of Ministry of Education & Youth of Chuvash Republic
- APA
For citation:
Myshkina A. F. (2022). Women’s Worldview of the Writer or the Aesthetic World of Literature (Reflections on the Term “Women’s Prose”). Development of education, 5(1), 10-14. EDN: YRYVCO. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-101084
UDC 82-1/-9
DOI: 10.31483/r-101084
Abstract
Modern Chuvash literature, like other national literatures, is developing in many ways. This is clearly shown by those works in which new phenomena are formed that were previously alien to the literature of the Soviet period.
The relevance of the article is connected with the need to determine the place and role of the concept of "women's prose" in Chuvash artistic creativity. The artistic world of Chuvash literature is primarily based on the worldview of the people and the uniqueness of the Chuvash language. Therefore, very often typical phenomena of Russian and world literature for the Chuvash literature become insignificant. In this regard, the purpose of the study was to present arguments in favor of the statement that the aesthetic world of the work is not directly related to the author's gender. The subject of the research in this article is the prose works of Chuvash women writers (Yu. Silem, U. Elmen, R. Prokopieva).
In the course of the study, the following results were obtained: the writer's worldview includes many components, the most significant of them are the gender and nationality of the author; the concept of "women's prose" is not relevant for Chuvash literature, since it manifests itself only within the framework of individual works and is mainly associated with philosophical, psychological and lyrical the style of the writer.
Keywords
References
- 1. Berdiaev, N. A. Filosofiia tvorchestva, kul'tury i iskusstva v dvukh tomakh. T.II.: Mirosozertsanie Dostoevskogo i dr. raboty., 510.
- 2. Gachev, G. D. Natsional'nye obrazy mira. Kurs lektsii., 430.
- 3. Kudriavtseva, R. A. (2015). Zhenskaia lichnost' v khudozhestvennom prostranstve mariiskogo rasskaza kontsa XX veka. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 4, 91-94.
- 4. Myshkina, A. F. (2009). Obraz zhenshchiny v literature. Narodnye i professional'nye traditsiia v kul'ture Chuvashii, 48-58. Cheboksary: Izd-vo Chuvash. un-ta.
- 5. Myshkina, A. F., Zaitseva, T. I., & Emel'ianova, T. N. (2019). Problemy natsional'noi estetiki i literaturnogo tvorchestva v khudozhestvennom prostranstve nachala XXI veka. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2. Tambov: Gramota.
- 6. Myshkina, A. F. (2019). Obraz sovremennosti v rasskaze R. Prokop'evoi "Odna tysiacha rublei". Problemy mariiskoi i sravnitel'noi filologii, 194-196. Ioshkar-Ola.
- 7. Nikiforova, V. V. (2011). Khal'khi literatura idei-ideale: 2001-2005 culsenchi proza. Chavash khalakh istoriiepe kul'turin civech yitavesem, 204-227. Shupashkar.
- 8. Nikiforova, V. V. (2020). Chuvashskaia zhenskaia proza v kontekste sovremennoi literatury. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, T. 13, 1, 67-71.
- 9. Prokop'eva, R. (2017). Per pin tenke. Tavan Atal, 6, 23-31.
- 10. Rodionov, V. G., Myshkina, A. F., & Khuzangai, A. P. (2017). Istoriia chuvashskoi literatury XX veka: v 2 ch. Ch.2. 1956-2000., 432. Cheboksary: Chuvash. kn. izd-vo.
- 11. Silem, Iu. (2001). Ikken: kalavsem., 240. Shupashkar: Chavash ken. izd-vi.
- 12. Myshkina, A. F. (2008). Sovremennaia Narspiana., 280. Cheboksary: Izd-vo Chuvash. un-ta.
- 13. Elmen, U. Ma ins'e-shi s'altaram?..Poves'sem, kalav., 207.
Comments(0)