- Main
- Journal "Ethnic culture"
- Vol 4, No 4
- Personalization and Anonymization of the Place of...
Personalization and Anonymization of the Place of Death of a Person in an Accident (Using the Example of Federal Highways a 151, P 178, P 241)
Research Article


- Published in:
- International academic journal «Ethnic Culture». Volume 4
- Author:
- Mikhail G. Matlin 1
- Work direction:
- World languages and literature
- Pages:
- 51-57
- Received: 12 October 2022 / Accepted: 20 December 2022 / Published: 23 December 2022
- Rating:
- Article accesses:
- 1601
- Published in:
- doaj РИНЦ
- APA
For citation:
Matlin M. G. (2022). Personalization and Anonymization of the Place of Death of a Person in an Accident (Using the Example of Federal Highways a 151, P 178, P 241). Ethnic Culture, 4(4), 51-57. EDN: OFDMDV. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-103766
- ВКонтакте
- РћРТвЂВВВВВВВВнокласснРСвЂВВВВВВВВРєРСвЂВВВВВВВВ
- РњРѕР№ Р В Р’В Р РЋРЎв„ўР В Р’В Р РЋРІР‚ВВВВВВВВРЎР‚
UDC 393
DOI: 10.31483/r-103766
Abstract
The tradition of marking the places of death in road accidents is now widespread on all continents and in most countries, including Russia. Roadside monuments, which are installed at the same time, are of two types: some correspond to monuments in cemeteries, others do not. Sometimes it is enough for loved ones only to mark the place of death itself. Then a monument is erected, completely or partially devoid of information about the deceased. This phenomenon is called anonymization of the place of death. But for many, it is not the place itself that is important, but the memory of the deceased person. In this case, the monument contains the most detailed information about the deceased, so personalization and individualization are created. It can be embodied with the help of the design features of the monument, photographs or images of the deceased, personal information, epitaphs and objects that are placed on or near the monuments. The article presents data on the uniqueness of personalization and anonymization, obtained as a result of a survey of routes A 151, P 241, P178. It was out that ompletely anonymous memorial signs make up 19% of all sings on the highway P 241, reach – 33% on the highway A 151 and 50% on the highway P 178. It can be assumed that a higher degree of anonymization on the A 151 and P 178 highway is due to special types of memorial signs (a flowerpot on the P 178 highway, a gazebo and a fence without a sign on the A 151 highway), as well as a large number of old metal signs that have lost photos, plates with information about the deceased. There are no clear boundaries between anonymization and personalization, there is a large number of transitional phenomena that can be simultaneously defined as both partial personalization and partial anonymization.
Keywords
References
- 1. Ar'es, F. (1992). Chelovek pered litsom smerti., 527. Progress-Akademiia.
- 2. Matlin, M. G. (2021). Death in the landscape: a spatial aspect of the modern tradition of marking places of death on highways (a case study of the Russian federal highways A 151, R 178, R 241). Geograficheskii vestnik, 4, 59-72.
- 3. Matlin, M. G. (2022). The modern tradition of marking the places of peopl’s deaths on highways (on the example of the Russian federal highways A 151, R 178, R 241). Traditsionnaia kul'tura, Tom 23, 1, 97-112.
- 4. Matlin, M. G., & Safronov, E. V. (2014). Cenotaphs as a contemporary form of objectivization of memory of the dead. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie, 2, 36-47.
- 5. Petrova, A. A. Fotograficheskie praktiki severnogo sela: izobrazitel'nyi kanon i kommunikativnyi potentsial. Retrieved from http://cmb.rsuh.ru/print.html?id=254914
- 6. Santino, D. (2019). Performativnye kommemorativy: spontannye sviatilishcha i publichnaia memorializatsiia smerti. Fol'klor i antropologiia goroda, 1, 14-26.
- 7. Robert, M. (2011). Bednar Materializing Memory: The Public Lives of Roadside Crash Shrines. Memory Connection, Volume 1, 1, 18.
- 8. Clark, J., & Cheshire, A. (2004). Rip by the Roadside: A Comparative Study of Roadside Memorials in New South Wales, Australia, and Texas, United States. OMEGA, Journal of Death and Dying, 48.
- 9. Clark, J., & Franzmann, M. (2006). Authority from Grief, Presence and Place in the Making of Roadside Memorials. Death Studies, Volume 30, 6, 579.
- 10. Hartig, K. V., & Dunn, K. M. (1998). Roadside Memorials: Interpreting New Deathscapes in Newcastle, New South Wales. Australian Geographical Studies, Volume 36, 1, 5.
- 11. Klaassens, M., Groote, P., & Huigen, P. (2009). Roadside memorials from a geographical perspective. Mortality, Volume 14, 2, 187.
- 12. Klaassens, M., Groote, P., & Vanclay, F. (2013). Expressions of private mourning in public space: The evolving structure of spontaneous and permanent roadside memorials in the Netherlands. Death Studies, Volume 37, . 2, 145.
- 13. Nesporova, O. (2008). The public remembrance of death. Sociologicky casopis, Volume 44, 1, 139.
- 14. Przybylska, L., & Flag, M. (2019). The anonymity of roadside memorials in Poland. Mortality, Volume 25, . 2, 208.
Documents
Full text (RUS)
675.51KbLinks
Journal
https://journalec.com/en/action/10432/infoExport citation
BibTex
.bib
Comments(0)