Teaching Materials in the Implementation of the Technology «Learning Through Teaching»

Research Article
EDN: SHDADP DOI: 10.31483/r-104328
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 5
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 5
Authors:
Elena A. Tolkacheva 1 , Sergei G. Ivanov 1
Work direction:
Discussion
Pages:
79-86
Received: 14 November 2022 / Accepted: 27 December 2022 / Published: 28 December 2022

Rating:
Article accesses:
2128
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University "LETI"
For citation:
Tolkacheva E. A., & Ivanov S. G. (2022). Teaching Materials in the Implementation of the Technology «Learning Through Teaching». Development of education, 5(4), 79-86. EDN: SHDADP. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-104328
UDC 37.02+378.147

Abstract

Introduction. The methodological support of the educational process is considered from the point of view of the didactic construction of the information environment of education using technical pedagogical tools in the implementation of the pedagogical technology "learning through teaching". To increase the complexity of the teaching content, the effectiveness of combining the "learning through teaching" approach with information technologies is considered proven. The most developed idea of such a combination is the introduction of a "pedagogical agent (comrade)", which carries out communication with the subject area and is an analogue of an expert system. From the point of view of designing an information learning environment, we can talk about using technical tools or their analogs as boundary objects. Horizontal interaction of participants with each other in the implementation of the technology "learning through teaching" generates new boundary objects that can be considered as the basis of methodological support of the educational process. The combination of these two approaches is the theoretical basis of part of the research carried out at the Department of Algorithmic Mathematics of SPBSET "LETI". Results. The role and place of teaching materials in the implementation of the technology "learning through teaching" is presented. The changes in the understanding of the content of teaching are confirmed not only in direct active "teaching", but also in the preparation of teaching materials.

Funding Agency

Grant Number

Russian Foundation for Basic Research 19-29-14141
Благодарим за помощь при подготовке материала Сергея Николаевича Позднякова, профессора кафедры алгоритмической математики СПбГЭТУ «ЛЭТИ».

References

  1. 1. Bashmakov, M. I., & Pozdniakov, S. N. (1997). Informatsionnaia sreda obucheniia. Reznik ;; Sankt-Peterburg: Svet.
  2. 2. Vygotskii, L. S. (1935). Umstvennoe razvitie detei v protsesse obucheniia. Leningrad. Retrieved from URL: http://psychlib.ru/mgppu/VUR/VUR-1935.html
  3. 3. Ivanov, S. G., & Pozdniakov, S. N. (2006). Komp'iuternoe modelirovanie formirovaniia matematicheskikh poniatii. Izvestiia SPbGETU LETI, 11, 38-42.
  4. 4. Pozdniakov, S. N. (2017). Sistema komp'iuternoi algebry kak pedagogicheskaia zadacha. Komp'iuternye instrumenty v obrazovanii, 2, 25-41.
  5. 5. Tolkacheva, E. A. (2021). Matematika v tekhnicheskom universitete: potentsial gorizontal'nykh sviazei. Komp'iuternye instrumenty v obrazovanii, 2, 84-100. doi:10.32603/2071-2340-2021-2-84-100.
  6. 6. Bargh, J. A., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.72.5.593
  7. 7. Benware, C. A., & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 755. doi:10.3102/00028312021004755
  8. 8. Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., & Vye, N. (2005). Learning by teaching: a new agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(3, 363. doi:10.1080/08839510590910200
  9. 9. Biswas, G., Segedy, J. R., & Bunchongchit, K. (2016). From Design to Implementation to Practice a Learning by Teaching System: Betty's Brain. Int J Artif Intell Educ, 26, 350. doi:10.1007/s40593-015-0057-9.
  10. 10. Chou, T., & Chan, C. (2003). Chou C.-Y. Redefining the learning companion: The past, present, and future of educational agents. Computers & Education, 40, 255. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315
  11. 11. Koh, A. W., Koh, W. L., Lee, S. C., & Lim, W. H. (2018). L. The learning benefits of teaching: A retrieval practice hypothesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(3), 401. doi:10.1002/acp.3410
  12. 12. Lachner, A., Jacob, L., & Hoogerheide, V. (2021). Learning by writing explanations: Is explaining to a fictitious student more effective than self-explaining?. Learning and Instruction, 74. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101438
  13. 13. Li, N., Matsud, N., Cohen, W. W., & Koedinger, K. R. (2015). Integrating representation learning and skill learning in a human-like intelligent agent. Artificial Intelligence, 219, 67. doi:10.1016/j.artint.2014.11.002.
  14. 14. Matsuda, N., Keiser, V., Raizada, R., Stylianides, G., & Cohen, W. W. (2010). Learning by Teaching SimStudent: Technical Accomplishments and an Initial Use with Students. V. Aleven, J. Kay & J. Mostow (Eds.). Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Berlin,. Germany.
  15. 15. Pozdnyakov, S., & Ivanov, S. (2004). Computers in productive teaching of mathematics or how information technologies can support intellectual freedom of the learner. The 10-th International Congress on Mathematical Education, National presentation: Russia, Selected materials, Copenhagen,. Denmark.
  16. 16. Roscoe, R. D. (2014). Self-monitoring and knowledge-building in learning by teaching. Instructional Science, 42, 327. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9283-4
  17. 17. Tolkacheva, E., Ivanov, S., & Pozdniakov, S. (2022). Implementation of Horizontal Connections in the Course of Mathematics by Combining Pedagogical and Digital Technologies. Mathematics, 10, 2352. doi:10.3390/math10132352

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.