Modern Approaches to the Methodology of Teaching History at the University

Research Article
EDN: DBSOXO DOI: 10.31483/r-110268
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 7
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 7
Authors:
Rustem A. Idrisov 1 , Marina N. Krasnova 1
Work direction:
Pedagogy and Modern Education
Pages:
28-35
Received: 28 February 2024 / Accepted: 19 March 2024 / Published: 25 March 2024

Rating:
Article accesses:
1476
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Chuvash State University
For citation:
Idrisov R. A., & Krasnova M. N. (2024). Modern Approaches to the Methodology of Teaching History at the University. Development of education, 7(1), 28-35. EDN: DBSOXO. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-110268
UDC 372.893

Abstract

Historical education in the system of higher educations is designed to solve not only teaching, but also upbringing tasks. Therefore, it is called upon to quickly and effectively overcome challenges which the historical education faces with the help of a specific political situation and social need. The modern situation is particularly acute in this regard. The concept of teaching Russian history to individuals of non-historical specialties and fields, which are implemented in higher education organisations, adopted in 2023, also testifies to this. The renewal of the content of historical education in the country requires the introduction of innovations in the field of the methodology of teaching. The methodological basis of history teaching in Russia has a long tradition, formed within the framework of several directions. Modern researchers of the problem note the special importance of the technological approach, which has become widespread in educational institutions of the country. However, it is not enough for today. The methodology of teaching history should precisely reflect the changes in the content of the discipline. At the same time, the range of methodological techniques in the teacher's arsenal may not change significantly. It is even possible to appeal to the experience of pre-revolutionary and Soviet methodology. But the question of the content of the methodological base and its objective orientation is core.

References

  1. 1. Adalova, Z. D., & Abdulvagabov, M. M. (2021). Certain Aspects of Innovative Approaches to Teaching History at Higher Education Institutions. Relevant studies, 48 (75), 42-45.
  2. 2. Bystrenko, V. I., & Iaroslavtsev, V. G. (2023). Teaching History in Non-Humanitarian Universities in Russia: on the Issue of a New Concept. Bulletin of Pedagogical Innovations, 1 (69), 31-41. EDN: ANLXKL. https://doi.org/10.15293/1812-9463.2301.04
  3. 3. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. The Concept of Teaching Russian History for Non-History Specialities and Training Areas. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation Website. Retrieved from https://minobrnauki.gov.ru/press-center/news/novosti-ministerstva/63748/
  4. 4. Zubrilina, A. Iu. (2017). Teaching History in Higher Educational Institutions. Koncept, S8, 6-10. Retrieved from http://e-koncept.ru/2017/470099.htm
  5. 5. The Concept of Teaching Russian history for Non-Historical Specialities and Areas of Training Implemented in Educational Organisations of Higher Education. Approved by the Protocol of the Expert Council for the Development of History Education of 02/15/2023 No. VF/15-pr. Laws, codes and regulations of the Russian Federation. Retrieved from https://legalacts.ru/doc/pismo-minobrnauki-rossii-ot-20022023-n-mn-5168376-o-napravlenii/
  6. 6. Korotkova, M. V. (2022). Modern Discussions of History Teaching Methods Development in Conditions of the School Studying Process Digitalization. Science and School, 3, 71-78. EDN: LLNSAS. https://doi.org/10.31862/1819-463X-2022-3-71-78
  7. 7. Korotkova, M. V., & Studenikin, M. T. (1999). Methodology of Teaching History in Schemes, Tables, Descriptions., 192. Moscow: Vlados.
  8. 8. Barabanov, V. V., & Lazukova, N. N. (2014). Methodology of Teaching History., 428. Moscow: Akademiia.
  9. 9. Rosina, N. L., & Rosina, M. A. (2023). The Concept of Teaching Russian History at University: from Project to Implementation. Higher Education in Russia, 32(5), 138-148. EDN: GFTUIP. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-5-138-148
  10. 10. Studenikin, M. T. (2000). Methodology of Teaching History at School., 240. Moscow: Vlados.
  11. 11. Studenikin, M. T. (2007). Modern Technologies for Teaching History at School., 79. Moscow: Vlados. EDN: QVMNFR.
  12. 12. Suslov, A. Iu., Salimgareev, M. V., & Khammatov, Sh. S. (2017). nnovative Methods of Teaching History at Modern Universities. Education and Science, 19(9), 70-85. EDN: ZULSVJ. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2017-9-70-85
  13. 13. Chubarian, A. O. (2022). Europe is not the one and only linguistic concern. Izvestiya. Retrieved from https://iz.ru/1281644/aleksandr-chubarian/ne-evropoi-edinoi
  14. 14. Shagbanova, Iu. B. (2023). eaching the Academic Discipline "History of Russia" in a Higher Educational Institution for Students of Non-Historical Specialties and Areas of Training: Main Trends and Motivations. World of Science. Pedagogy and Psychology, 11(4). EDN: UTIDMN. Retrieved from https://mir-nauki.com/PDF/36PDMN423.pdf
  15. 15. Shogan, V. V. (2007). Methodology of Teaching History at School: a New Technology of Person-Centred History Education., 475. Rostov-on-Don: Phoenix. EDN: QVURHX.
  16. 16. Shogan, V. V., & Storozhakova, E. V. (2024). Methodology of Teaching History at School., 433. Moscow: Yurayt.
  17. 17. Shogan, V. V., & Storozhakova, E. V. (2024). Methodology of Teaching History. Visual Images on History Lessons., 301. Moscow: Yurayt.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.