The use of modular technology in the design of basic educational programs in accordance with the FES of HE 3 ++

Research Article
EDN: YZYFCX DOI: 10.31483/r-21961
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education»
Author:
Aleksandr A. Kiselev 1
Work direction:
Discussion
Pages:
82-85
Received: 14 December 2018

Rating:
Article accesses:
5119
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 ФГБОУ ВО «Ярославский государственный технический университет»
For citation:
Kiselev A. A. (2019). The use of modular technology in the design of basic educational programs in accordance with the FES of HE 3 ++. Development of education, 82-85. EDN: YZYFCX. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-21961
UDC 378.14.015.62

Abstract

The article shows the problems of developing educational programs and curricula in accordance with the Federal State Educational Standards of Higher Education (FES of HE 3++). Federal Law №273 «On Education in the Russian Federation» states that the introduction of basic educational programs implies the use of structures for the design of educational activities, based on the principle of a modular understanding of the basic educational program. and curriculum design. The article proposed one of the options for the formation of such modules in the design of basic educational programs in accordance with the FES of HE 3 ++. With this approach to educational programs formation in various areas of training students of higher education institutions, problems can be solved in the development of basic educational programs of previous FES of HE++, the labor costs of the teaching staff in developing various educational and methodical documentation can be optimized, the requirements of employers for the effectiveness of training future professionals can be taken into account.

References

  1. 1. Kasprzhak, A. G., & Kalashnikov, S. P. (2015). Razrabotka modelei obrazovatel'nykh programm akademicheskogo bakalavriata i issledovatel'skoi magistratury v ramkakh realizatsii programmy modernizatsii pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniia: pervye itogi. Psikhologicheskaia nauka i obrazovanie, 5, 29-44.
  2. 2. Korneeva, N. Iu., Korneev, D. N., & Uvarina, N. V. (2016). Modul'noe obuchenie kak metodicheskaia osnova konstruirovaniia obrazovatel'nykh programm vysshego obrazovaniia. Vestnik Cheliabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 6, 63-70.
  3. 3. Korneeva, N. Iu. (2011). Formirovanie gotovnosti pedagoga professional'nogo obucheniia k sozdaniiu inkliuzivnoi sredy obrazovaniia. Vestnik Iuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 38 (255), 49-52.
  4. 4. Kiselev, A. A. (2018). Uroki i vyvody ot vnedreniia Bolonskoi sistemy v rossiiskoe vysshee obrazovanie. Idei V.A. Sukhomlinskogo v teorii i praktike (k 100-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia vydaiushchegosia pedagoga-gumanista V.A. Sukhomlinskogo), 157-160. Cheboksary: ID "Sreda".
  5. 5. Kiselev, A. A. (2018). Problemy podgotovki studentov, obuchaiushchikhsia v gosudarstvennykh vuzakh na platnoi osnove, kak professionalov i puti ikh resheniia. Pedagogicheskie i sotsiologicheskie aspekty obrazovaniia, Cheboksary: ID "Sreda"., 333-335.
  6. 6. Kiselev, A. A. (2017). Problemy profstandartov i formirovaniia professional'nykh kompetentsii u studentov otechestvennykh vuzov. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal, 6(21), 69-72. M.: AR-Konsalt.
  7. 7. Kiselev, A. A. Professional'nye standarty i ikh rol' v formirovanii novykh obrazovatel'nykh standartov vysshego obrazovaniia FGOS 3++. Obrazovanie: traditsii i innovatsii: Materialy XVII mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (26 aprelia 2018 goda); otv. redaktor N.V. Uvarina, Praga: Izd, 2018, 125-127.
  8. 8. Korshunova, S. V. (2010). Proektirovanie osnovnykh obrazovatel'nykh programm vuza pri realizatsii urovnevoi podgotovki kadrov na osnove federal'nykh gosudarstvennykh obrazovatel'nykh standartov., 212. M.: MIPK MGTU im. N.E. Baumana.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.