Dialogue in the Cognitive Process: History and Modernity

Research Article
EDN: ZKOCGP DOI: 10.31483/r-63825
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education»
Authors:
Vadim V. Podgornov 1 , Yuliya A. Makarova 1 , Lyudmila A. Belova 1 , Elena A. Shamrova 1
Work direction:
Theoretical and applied education research
Pages:
46-49
Received: 20 November 2019

Rating:
Article accesses:
4581
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 National Research Mordovia State University
For citation:
Podgornov V. V., Makarova Y. A., Belova L. A., & Shamrova E. A. (2019). Dialogue in the Cognitive Process: History and Modernity. Development of education, 46-49. EDN: ZKOCGP. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-63825
UDC 101.1

Abstract

The article deals with the concept of dialogue as a method of traditional cognition and a consistent semiotic instrumental expression of human culture, which explores the systems and ways of social communication in the society. The article focuses on dialogue as a special form of a cognitive process and mediation, having its distinct features, analyzed when the individual is included in many systems of sociocultural interaction at the level of functional integrity. Along with comparative and descriptive approaches, analytic and dialectic methods have been used. The significance of two historical stages of dialogue development as a method of cognition has been analyzed, as well as their distinguishing characteristics and comparative relationship. The method belongs to a group of ritual methods organically related to the art of human self-change as a person. Each of these stages bears its own specific features related to the human genesis, ethics, communication and the metaphysical world. It can be concluded that in the contemporary world, dialogue fully reflects the peculiarities of communication of presence, as well as the value principles of social perception of time and space in the context of the symbolic model of mediareality, which in turn is changing the typology, interests and character of the modern subject. The prospects for development of the phenomenon are also related to the semiotic ideas about the nature of a human, their conceptual apparatus and functional load in the symbolic organization of mental activity as such. Being under the control of consciousness of communicative strategies implies a controlling role of the worldview in relation to them.

References

  1. 1. Pesotskaia, E. (2009). K voprosu ob etnicheskom mentalitete kak faktore sokhraneniia kul'turnykh i natsional'nykh traditsii v usloviiakh protsessa globalizatsii (sotsial'no-filosofskii analiz). Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo un-ta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, N, 338-343. Novgorod: Izd-vo NNGU.
  2. 2. Pesotskaia, E. N. (2015). Evoliutsiia metodologii sotsial'nogo analiza cheloveka v istorii nauki (antropofilosofskii aspekt)., 112. Saransk: Izd-vo Mordov. un-ta.
  3. 3. Kuznetsova, E. I. (2009). Evoliutsiia mediakul'turnykh kommunikativnykh form v epokhu moderna: sotsial'no-filosofskii aspekt. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo un-ta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo, N. Novgorod: Izd, , 331-337.
  4. 4. Annenskii, E. F. (2017). Evripid. Polnoe sobranie tragedii v odnom tome., 1130. M.: Al'fa kniga.
  5. 5. (2005). Platon. Gosudarstvo. Slovo o sushchem., 572. M.: Nauka.
  6. 6. (2018). Platon. O znanii., , 1311. Basova;; M.: Al'fa kniga.
  7. 7. (2018). Platon. O sushchem., , 1311. Basova;; M.: Al'fa kniga.
  8. 8. Filosofiia dialoga M.M. Bakhtina. Retrieved from https://spravochnick.ru/ filosofiya/istoriya_russkoy_filosofii/filosofiya_
  9. 9. Gagaev, A. A., & Pesotskaia, E. N. (2002). Estestvenno-nauchnye osnovaniia teorii sotsial'noi aktivnosti lichnosti: monografiia., 40. Saransk: Izd-vo Mordov. un-t.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.