En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Journal "Development of education"
  3. No 4 (10)
  4. "Dictionary of the Chuvash Language" by N.I. Ashma...

"Dictionary of the Chuvash Language" by N.I. Ashmarin as a Guardian of the Genetic Memory of the People: Linguoculturological Aspect

Research Article
EDN: VFQNGD DOI: 10.31483/r-96911
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education»
Authors:
Albina F. Myshkina 1 , Inessa V. Iadranskaia 2
Work direction:
Theoretical and Applied Education Research
Pages:
20-25
Received: 12 November 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
4312
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Chuvash State Institute of Humanities of Ministry of Education & Youth of Chuvash Republic
2 Chuvash Republican Institute of Education of the Ministry of Education and Youth Policy of the Chuvash Republic
For citation:
Myshkina A. F., & Iadranskaia I. V. (2020). "Dictionary of the Chuvash Language" by N.I. Ashmarin as a Guardian of the Genetic Memory of the People: Linguoculturological Aspect. Development of education, 20-25. EDN: VFQNGD. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-96911
UDC 801.83

Abstract

The article is devoted to identifying the role of the «Dictionary of the Chuvash language» by N.I. Ashmarin in revealing the mental foundations of modern Chuvash and in determining the sociocultural and psychological type of character of the Chuvash. The relevance of the study is due to the fact that during the period of globalization and universalization of cultures, the return to the original values of the nation, the search for individual-folk traits of a person's character in his worldview and lifestyle, which is most clearly recorded in his language, is of great importance. The human language retains a large amount of information that contributes to its spiritual, scientific, technical and industrial development. Therefore, the analysis of vocabulary also contributes to the study of the history of the development of man, people, nation, humanity. The purpose of the research is to study the socio-historical, cultural and ethical information enshrined in the vocabulary of the people and recorded in this dictionary. The principles of methodology, that reflect elements of conceptology, hermeneutics and general philology are used in the study. It is concluded that the Chuvash language (more broadly, the Chuvash culture) is an integral part of the ancient Turkic world, therefore research in this direction expands the framework of understanding the philosophy, history, theology and everyday life of the Chuvash people.

References

  1. 1. Alekseev, A. (1995). Chavash filologiien klassike. Savar, Chyk, 3.
  2. 2. Andreev, I. (1970). Asla tepchevce. Tavan Atal, 9, 67-70.
  3. 3. Andreev, I. (1995). Chavash aslalakhen aslashshe. Khypar, Iupa, 4.
  4. 4. Andreev, I. (1996). N.I. Ashmarin i sovremennoe chuvashskoe iazykoznanie. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta, 2, 26-32.
  5. 5. Ashmarin, N.I. (1994). Slovar' chuvashskogo iazyka. T. 1,2., 584. Cheboksary: Russika.
  6. 6. Bairam, B. (2012). Kakim dolzhno byt' novoe izdanie Slovaria chuvashskogo iazyka N.I. Ashmarina?. Ashmarinskie chteniia, 276-284. Cheboksary: Izd-vo ChU.
  7. 7. Vasil'eva, E. N.I. Ashmarin tata khalakha verentes ec. Khypar. -1996. -. Push, 26.
  8. 8. Vinogradov, Iu. (1980). Chelkhe khavatne enense. Ialav, 10, 32.
  9. 9. Dimitriev, V.D. (1996). N.I. Ashmarin palkharsempe chavashsen chelkhe tata etnos perlekhe cinchen verentni. Khypar. Avan, 24.
  10. 10. Egorov, V.G. (1948). N.I. Ashmarin kak issledovatel' chuvashskogo iazyka: k 75-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia., 44. Cheboksary: Chuvashgosizdat.
  11. 11. Il'ina, G.G., & Myshkina, A.F. (2016). Fol'klorno-mifologicheskoe znachenie fitonimov v poetike chuvashskikh proizvedenii. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 6, 29-32.
  12. 12. Il'ina, G.G., & Myshkina, A.F. (2017). Traditsionnye predstavleniia chuvashei o fol'klornom personazhe Inkek. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 6, 23-25.
  13. 13. Isaev, Iu.N. (2015). Fitonimicheskaia kartina mira v raznostrukturnykh iazykakh., 413. Cheboksary.
  14. 14. Larionov, N. (2003). Ashmarin chavash khalakhe pulsa kaini cinchen. Kanash, Avan, 4, 36, 5.
  15. 15. Larionov, N. (2004). Ashmarin. Kanash, Aka, 1, 14, 4.
  16. 16. Maslova, V.A. (2001). Lingvokul'turologiia: uchebnoe posobie dlia studentov vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii., 208. M.: Akademiia.
  17. 17. Myshkina, A.F. (2012). Filosofskoe i poeticheskoe tolkovanie tragicheskoi smerti v poeme "Narspi" K. Ivanova. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta, 1, 288-290.
  18. 18. Myshkina, A.F. (2012). Pis'ma Mikhaila Sespelia k Anastasii Cherviakovoi kak otrazhenie chuvashskogo mentaliteta. Mentalitet i etnokul'turnoe razvitie volzhskikh narodov: istoriia i sovremennost', 204-205. Cheboksary: Izd-vo ChGIGN.
  19. 19. Myshkina, A.F., & Iakovleva, O.N. (2015). O nekotorykh fol'klorno-mifologicheskikh i religiozno-misticheskikh osobennostiakh soznaniia chuvashskogo naroda. Filologicheskie nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 12, 135-137.
  20. 20. Skvortsov, M.I. (1995). Chavash chelkhin puianlakhe N.I. Ashmarin slovarenche. Khalakh shkule=Narodnaia shkola, 5, 66-70.
  21. 21. Fedotov, M.R. (1995). N.I. Ashmarin: kratkii ocherk zhizni i deiatel'nosti., 51. Cheboksary.
  22. 22. Fedotov, M.R. (1995). Ternistyi put' Ashmarina k mnogotomnomu slovariu chuvashskogo iazyka. Sovetskaia Chuvashiia. Mai, 24,.
  23. 23. Fedotov, M.R. (1995). Velikii tiurkolog. Sovetskaia Chuvashiia, Oktiabr', 7.
  24. 24. Fedotov, M.R. (1998). V iunosheskom trude skazalsia ves' Ashmarin. Sovetskaia Chuvashiia. Mai, 20.
  25. 25. Khuzangai, A. (2000). Stolp i utverzhdenie chuvashskoi filologii. Sovetskaia Chuvashiia. Aprel, 14.
  26. 26. Chernov, M.F. (1996). "Slovar' chuvashskogo iazyka" N.I. Ashmarina. Izvestiia Inzhenerno-tekhnologicheskoi akademii Chuvashskoi Respubliki, 1 (2), 245-249.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.