Features of Digital Education Mentors’ Innovations

Research Article
EDN: PISDYI DOI: 10.31483/r-98810
Open Access
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 4
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International academic journal «Development of education». Volume 4
Authors:
Elena E. Merzon 1 , Irene Sibgatullina-Denis 2 , Alica Vančová 3 , Snezhana G. Ushakova 1
Work direction:
Pedagogy and Modern Education
Pages:
20-25
Received: 15 May 2021 / Accepted: 7 June 2021 / Published: 8 June 2021

Rating:
Article accesses:
3467
Published in:
doaj РИНЦ
1 Yelabuga Institute (Branch) of FSBEI of HE “Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University”
2 Institute for Intellectual Integrations
3 Comenius University
For citation:
Merzon E. E., Sibgatullina-Denis I., Vančová A., & Ushakova S. G. (2021). Features of Digital Education Mentors’ Innovations. Development of education, 4(2), 20-25. EDN: PISDYI. https://doi.org/10.31483/r-98810
UDC 371.134

Abstract

Introduction. The strategy for the development of international education 20.30 stimulates the study of the issues in the implementation of digital education around the world. The article discusses current applied and practical issues of digital education that educational management specialists came across. Materials and Methods. The authors research management of digital education through mentoring, mentoring pedagogy and mentoring innovations in traditional learning environments and during the time of crisis. The study presents an applied comparative analysis of the questions of targeted intensities, digital footprint, the SELFIE portal usage features, objectives and technologies for training digital mentors. Results. The research findings show an underutilisation of informal education ideas and technologies in the in the process of training digital mentors. The predominance and stable efficiency in the use of informal education takes place at leading European universities. From the standpoint of a humanistic view, exactly informal education is able to balance and regulate the need for knowledge of technologies of an innovative digital economy and its own individual resource for preserving itself, basic life values, and form digital education informal mentors. Discussion and Conclusion. Why does the mentor of a targeted digital educational intensive have a psychological advantage? Can everyone become a mentor in network communication for the rest, and what are the digital education mentor’s competencies? What contribution can everyone make to the training of the others? The discussion these issues in the context of management strategies for the development of international education, and the implementation of the European plan for the quality of digital education will be useful to for heads of educational organizations, departments of continuing professional education and academic mobility of educators.

References

  1. 1. (2018) Digital Education Action Plan. ec.europa. Retrieved from URL: https://ec.europa.eu/education/education-in-the-eu/digital-education-action-plan_en
  2. 2. (2019). eTwinning – Portal of the school community in Europe. etwinning. Retrieved from URL: https://www.etwinning.net/en/pub/index.htm
  3. 3. Elena, E., & Oscar, R. (2020). Merzon, Riabov Resonant mechanisms of territory branding in the DUDR System: Smart University. Veliky Novgorod.
  4. 4. Merzon, E.E., & Riabov, O.R. The ambiguity of digital education issues. No: Psychology in Education, 2019, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39-43.
  5. 5. Modern Workplace. The difference between formal and informal learning. Retrieved from URL: https://www.modernworkplacelearning.com/cild/mwl/the-difference-between-formal-and-informal-learning/
  6. 6. (2019) SELFIE – Reference information on the portal in // ec.europa. Retrieved from URL: https: https://ec.europa.eu/education/sites/education/files/selfie-info-factsheet_en.pdf
  7. 7. (2019) SELFIE. ec.europa. Retrieved from URL: https://ec.europa.eu/education/schools-go-digital
  8. 8. SELFIE on "Twitter". Retrieved from URL: https://twitter.com/hashtag/SELFIE_EU?src=hash
  9. 9. Shulman, E. (2019). The country of "understandable tomorrow": cultural tools of political science. School of Anthropology of the Future, RANESS. December 13. Retrieved from URL: http://ppr19.ru/prognoziruemoe-proektiruemoe-zhelaemoe-budushhee-_-shulman.htm
  10. 10. Sibgatullina, I.F., & Nugumanova, L.N. (2019). Informal education and benchmarking in the system of learning cities. Visual Anthropology, 489. Yaroslav the Wise.
  11. 11. Sibgatullina, I.F., Shakirova, D.M., Ryabov O.R. (2019). The running of time in digital education., 4.; Kazan: GAOU DPO IRO RT.
  12. 12. Sibgatullina, I.F., Vanchova, A., Nurgatina, I.E., & Pavlukhina, E.V. (2021). Tsifrovoe nastavnichestvo v sisteme benchmarkinga vostrebovannykh formatov obrazovaniia i upravleniia talantami. Vestnik SVFU, Vostochnyi federal'nyi universitet imeni M.K. Ammosova". Retrieved from http://ppfsvfu.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/%D0%9F%D0%9F%D0%A4-1-2021.pdf
  13. 13. Sibgatullina, I., Riabov, O., Merzon, E., Vancova, A., & Sulovska, M. (2020). Digital perspectives of benchmarking education in conditions of uncertainty. Paedagogica specialis 34: zbornik vedeckych prispevkov Pedagogickej fakulty Univerzity Komenskeho v Bratislave. – 1. vyd., 261. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenskeho v Bratislave. Retrieved from URL: http://alis.uniba.sk
  14. 14. Sibgatullina-Denis, I., Riabov, O.R., Merzon, E.E., & Vancova, A. Descriptive Analysis of Benchmarking in Respect to SMART. doi:10.15507/1991-9468.101.024.202004.532-551

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.