Детерминанты выбора модели поведения свидетелей в ситуации школьной травли

Глава в книге
DOI: 10.31483/r-111196
Open Access
монография «Теоретические и практические аспекты педагогики и психологии»
Creative commons logo
Опубликовано в:
монография «Теоретические и практические аспекты педагогики и психологии»
Автор:
Король Н. В. 1
Рубрика:
Глава 10
Страницы:
157-170
Получена: 17.04.2024

Рейтинг:
Статья просмотрена:
661 раз
Размещено в:
РИНЦ
1 Белорусский государственный университет
Для цитирования:

Аннотаци

В главе рассмотрено понятие ролей в буллинге, на основании анализа литературных источников выделены основные роли: агрессор; жертва; свидетель, подкрепляющий поведение буллера; помощник буллера; пассивный наблюдатель; защитник жертвы. Автором описаны психологические детерминаны выбора модели поведения (роли) в ситуации школьной травли.

Список литературы

  1. 1. Ледовая Я.А. Отчуждение моральной ответственности: психологический конструкт и методы его измерения / Я.А. Ледовая, Р.В. Тихонов, О.Н. Боголюбова [и др.] // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Психология. – 2016. – №4. – С. 23–39. DOI 10.21638/11701/spbu16.2016.402. EDN YFMSBJ
  2. 2. Almeida A., Correia I., Marinho S. Moral disengagement, normative beliefs of peer group, and attitudes regarding roles in bullying // Journal of School Violence. – 2010. Vol. 9. P. 23–36.
  3. 3. Andreou E., Vlachou A., Didaskalou E. The roles of self-efficacy, peer interactions and attitudes in bully-victim incidents: implications for intervention policy-practices // School Psychology International. 2005. Vol. 26 (5). P. 545–562. DOI 10.1177/0143034305060789. EDN JPWFKN
  4. 4. Barchia K., Bussey K. Predictors of student defenders of peer aggression victims: Empathy and social cognitive factors // International Journal of Behavioral Development. 2011. Vol. 35. №4. P. 289–297.
  5. 5. Bandura A., Barbaranelli C., Caprara G.V. Pastorelli C. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996. Vol. 71. P. 364–374. EDN HITIDT
  6. 6. Bandura A., Caprara G.V., Barbaranelli C., Pastorelli C. Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001. Vol. 80. P. 125–135. EDN GXUCNP
  7. 7. Bandura A. Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities // Personality and Social Psychology Review. 1999. Vol. 3. P. 193–209. DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3. EDN JPBNLP
  8. 8. Bebeau M.J., Rest J.R., Narvaez D. Beyond the promise: A perspective on research in moral education // Educational Researcher. 1999. Vol. 28. P. 18–26. DOI 10.3102/0013189X028004018. EDN JRPAKX
  9. 9. Bellmore A., Ma T-L., You J., Hughes M. A two-method investigation of early adolescents’ responses upon witnessing peer victimization in school // Journal of Adolescence. 2012. Vol. 35. P. 1265–1276.
  10. 10. Camodeca M., Coppola G. Participant roles in preschool bullying: The impact of emotion regulation, social preference, and quality of the teacher-child relationship // Social Development. 2019. Vol. 28 (1). P. 3–21.
  11. 11. Carlo G., Mestre M.V., McGinley M.M., Samper P., Tur A., Sandman D. The interplay of emotional instability, empathy and coping on prosocial and aggressive behaviors // Personality and Individual Differences. 2012. Vol. 53. P. 675–680.
  12. 12. Cappadocia M.C., Pepler D., Cummings J.G., Craig W. Individual motivations and characteristics with bystander intervention during bullying episodes among children and youth // Canadian Journal of School Psychology. 2012. Vol. 27. P. 201–216.
  13. 13. Catalano R.F., Berglund M.L., Ryan J., Lonczak H.S., Hawkis J.D. Positive youth development in the United States: research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs // Prevention & Treatment. 2002. Vol. 5.
  14. 14. Craig W.M. The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children // Personality and individual differences. 1998. Vol. 24 (1). P. 123–130.
  15. 15. Craig W.M., Pepler D., Atlas R. Observations of bullying in the playground and in the classroom // School Psychology International. 2000. Vol. 21. P. 22–36. DOI 10.1177/0143034300211002. EDN JPWCSN
  16. 16. Dovidio J.F., Piliavin J.A., Schroeder D.A., Penner L.A. The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2006.
  17. 17. Frisén A. Holmqvist K. Adolescents’ own suggestions for bullying interventions at age 13 and 16 // Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2010. Vol. 51. P. 123–131.
  18. 18. Gini G., Albiero P., Benelli B., Alto G. Determinants of adolescents’ active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying // Journal of Adolescence. 2008. Vol. 31. P. 93–105.
  19. 19. Grennan S. Woodhams J. The impact of bullying and coping strategies on the psychological distress of young offenders // Psychology, Crime & Law. 2007. Vol. 13 (5). P. 487–504.
  20. 20. Jimerson S.R., Swearer S.M., Espelage D.L. Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective. – New York, NY: Routledge, 2010.
  21. 21. Jordan J. Taking the first step toward a moral action: A review of moral sensitivity measurement across domains // The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 2007. Vol. 168. P. 323–359.
  22. 22. Kärnä A., Voeten M., Poskiparta E., Salmivalli C. Vulnerable children in varying classroom contexts: Bystanders' behaviors moderate the effects of risk factors on victimization // Merrill-Palmer Quarterly. 2010. Vol. 56 (3). P. 261–282.
  23. 23. Nickerson A.B., Mele D., Princiotta D. Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions // Journal of School Psychology. 2008. Vol. 46 (6). P. 687–703.
  24. 24. Obermann M. Moral disengagement among bystanders to school bullying // Journal of School Violence. 2011. Vol. 10. P. 239–257.
  25. 25. Obermann M.L. Moral disengagement in self-reported and peer-nominated school bullying // Aggressive Behavior. 2011. Vol. 37. P. 133–144.
  26. 26. O’Connell P., Pepler D., Craig W. Peer involvement in bullying; insights and challenges for intervention // Journal of Adolescence. 1999. Vol. 22 (4). P. 437–452. EDN GRGPFF
  27. 27. Oh I., Hazler R.J. Contributions of personal and situational factors to bystanders’ reactions to school bullying // School Psychology International. 2009. Vol. 30. P. 291–310.
  28. 28. O’Moor M. Kirkham C. Self-esteem and its relationship to bullying behavior // Aggressive Behavior. 2001. Vol. 27. P. 269–283.
  29. 29. Olweus D. Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Cambridge, 1993. – 140 pp.
  30. 30. Porter J.R., Smith-Adcock S. Children who help victims of bullying: Implications for practice // International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling. 2011. Vol. 33. P. 196–205. DOI 10.1007/s10447-011-9121-9. EDN SVPIDZ
  31. 31. Pozzoli T., Gini G., Vieno A. Individual and class moral disengagement in bullying among elementary school children // Aggressive Behavior. (2012a). Vol. 38. P. 378–388.
  32. 32. Salmivalli C., Kaukiainen A., Voeten M. Anti-bullying intervention: Implementation and outcome // British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2005. Vol. 75. P. 465–487.
  33. 33. Salmivalli C., Kaukiainen A., Kaistaniemi L. Lagerspetz K. Self-evaluated self-esteem, peer-evaluated self-esteem and defensive egotism as predictors of adolescents’ participation in bullying situations // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1999. Vol. 25 (10). P. 1268–1278.
  34. 34. Salmivalli C., Lagerspetz K., Björkqvist K., Österman K., Kaukiainen A. Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group // Aggressive behavior. 1996. Vol. 22 (1). P. 1–15.
  35. 35. Salmivalli C., Voeten M., Poskiparta E. Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms // Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. 2011. Vol. 40 (5). P. 668–676.
  36. 36. Schwarzer R., Dunkel-Schetter C., Weiner B., Woo G. Expectancies as mediators between recipient characteristics and social support intentions. In: Schwarzer R, editor. Self-Efficacy: Thought Control of Action. Washington: Hemisphere Publishing, 1992. – P. 65–90.
  37. 37. Slee P.T., Rigby K. The relationship of Eysenck’s personality factors and self-esteem to bully-victim behaviour in Australian schoolboys // Personality and Individual differences. 1993. Vol. 14 (2). P. 371–373.
  38. 38. Tani F., Greenman P., Schneider B., Fregoso M. Bullying and the Big Five: A Study of Childhood Personality and Participant Roles in Bullying Incidents // School Psychology International. 2013. Vol. 24 (2). P. 131–146.
  39. 39. Thornberg R. Schoolchildren's social representations on bullying causes // Psychology in the schools. 2010. Vol. 47 (4). P. 311–327.
  40. 40. Tsang S.K.M., Hui E.K.P., Law B.C.M. Bystander position taking in school bullying: The role of positive identity, self-efficacy and self-determination // The Scientific World Journal. 2011. Vol. 11. P. 2278–2286.
  41. 41. Tsang S.K.M., Yip F.Y.Y. Positive identity as a positive youth development construct: conceptual bases and implications for curriculum development. In: Shek DTL, Ma HK, Merrick J, editors. Positive Youth Development: Development of a Pioneering Program in a Chinese Context. London: Freund Publishing House, 2007. P. 227–235.

Комментарии(0)

При добавлении комментария укажите:
  • степень актуальности публикуемого материала;
  • общую оценку (оригинальность и актуальность темы, полнота, глубина, всесторонность раскрытия темы, логичность, связность, доказательность, структурная упорядоченность, характер и достоверность примеров, иллюстративного материала, убедительность выводов);
  • недостатки, недочеты;
  • вопросы и пожелания Автору.