Contract Formation: Comparing Common Law and Russian Civil Law

Theses of Report
VI International Conference «Days of Student Science»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
VI International Conference «Days of Student Science»
Author:
Mama Amanova 1
Scientific adviser:
Liliia R. Nurova1
Work direction:
Современные гуманитарные науки и проблемы языкознания
Pages:
10-11
Received: 12 April 2022

Rating:
Article accesses:
1428
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Kazanskii filial FGBOU VO "Rossiiskii gosudarstvennyi universitet pravosudiia"
For citation:
Amanova M. (2022). Contract Formation: Comparing Common Law and Russian Civil Law. Days of Student Science, 10-11. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

This article covers the most basic legal concepts in the formation of contracts in common law and Russian civil law. It reveals core aspects of the principal terms of the contracts in common law and Russian civil law.

References

  1. 1. Ivanova E. V. Civil Law. Special Course, 5th Edition, Textbook and workshop for higher education institutions, 2020. – P. 18–21.
  2. 2. Ivanova E. V. Contract Law. Special Course, 3rd Edition, Vol.2, Textbook and workshop for higher education institutions, 2021. – P. 10–11.
  3. 3. Verkerke J.H. Contract Doctrine, Theory and Practice. Vol.1, CALI eLangdell Press 2012. – P. 56–59.
  4. 4. Otis F. Wood, Appellant, v. Lucy, Lady Duff-Gordon, Respondent. 222 N. Y. 88, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
  5. 5. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part One No.-51 FZ, Nov 30, 1994. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_5142/ (accessed: 30.01.2022).
  6. 6. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part Two No.-51 FZ, Nov 26, 1996. URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_9027/#dst0 (accessed: 30.01.2022).
  7. 7. Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), 2020 ed. URL: https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc (accessed: 30.01.2022).

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.