Natsionalizm i populizm kak psikhologicheskie fenomeny

Book Chapter
DOI: 10.31483/r-105380
Open Access
Monograph «Pedagogy and Psychology as Sciences for the Formation of the Potential of Modern Society»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monograph «Pedagogy and Psychology as Sciences for the Formation of the Potential of Modern Society»
Author:
Aleksandr I. Kugai 1
Work direction:
Глава 10
Pages:
127-136
Received: 6 February 2023

Rating:
Article accesses:
1325
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Severo-Zapadnyi institut upravleniia FGBOU VO "Rossiiskaia akademiia narodnogo khoziaistva i gosudarstvennoi sluzhby pri Prezidente RF"
For citation:
Kiselev A. A., Samoilov L. P., Danilchenko S. L., Belova N. M., Gorbunova V. V., Maiatskaia N. K., Novikova V. P., Evdokimova N. V., Matalygina O. A., Shestakova M. D., Gurova M. M., Glotova G. A., Dorofeeva O. V., Kugai A. I., Kugai A. I., Kugai A. I., Korol N. V., Glotova G. A., Verkhoturova M. V., Bushuev V. V., Parfenova G. L., Kostenko E. G., Sokolov V. L., & Kugai A. I. (2023). Pedagogy and Psychology as Sciences for the Formation of the Potential of Modern Society, 216. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/a-10466

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to shed light on the interweaving of nationalism and populism, to identify the structural and socio-psychological factors from which the two discourses emerge. Nationalism is to come - as not so much a rational, but rather an emotional phenomenon, consisting of higher gnostic feelings of the belonging of mental processes to our "I". There are "banal" and "hot" forms of nationalism "banal" nationalism can be defined as the psychological presence of the nation against the background of everyday socio-political practices. Nationalism in the "hot" sense is to be as a psychological force that creates nation-states or threatens the stability of existing states. Also, Populist slogans are based on the psychology of winning one or another political force the trust and support of the masses. At the same time, the real goals of populist politicians (struggle for power, business project and enrichment), as a rule, are covered with socially attractive ideas. Standard populist statement: "We, the common people, will take to the streets and take back the country."

References

  1. 1. Кугай А.И. Проблема нациестроительства в свете концепции М.В. Ломоносова / А.И. Кугай // Управленческое консультирование // Управленческое консультирование. – 2012. – №2 (46). – С. 32–38.
  2. 2. Кугай А.И. Избирательные квоты и политическая конкуренция / А.И. Кугай // Социально-экономические процессы современного общества: теория и практика: материалы Всерос. науч.-практ. конф. (Чебоксары, 21 мая 2021 г.) / редкол.: Э.В. Фомин [и др.] – Чебоксары: Среда, 2021. – С. 248–250.
  3. 3. Angus Stewart, The Social Roots’, in Ghita Ionescu and Ernest Gellner. Populism: Its Meanings and National Characteristics. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1969, pp. 180–196.
  4. 4. Anthony Giddens, The Nation-State and Violence: Volume Two of a Contemporary Critique of Historical Materialism. Cambridge: Polity, 1985.
  5. 5. Arash Abizadeh, On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem, The American Political Science Review, 106. 2012, pp. 867–882.
  6. 6. Andrew Arato, Political Theology and Populism, in Carlos de la Torre (Ed.) The Promise and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 2015, pp. 31–58,
  7. 7. Benjamin De Cleen, Populism and Nationalism in Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 342–362.
  8. 8. Benjamin Arditi, Populism as an Internal Periphery of Democratic Politics, in Francisco Panizza (Ed.) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy (London and New York: Verso, 2005), pp. 72–98.
  9. 9. Ben Stanley, The Thin Ideology of Populism, Journal of Political Ideologies, 13. 2008, pp. 95–110.
  10. 10. Benjamin Arditi, Populism as an Internal Periphery of Democratic Politics and the Mirror of Democracy (London and New York: Verso, 2005, pp. 72–98.
  11. 11. Cas Mudde, The Populist Zeitgeist, Government and Opposition, Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2014, pp. 542–563.
  12. 12. David Runciman, The Paradox of Political Representation, Journal of Political Philosophy, 15. 2007, pp. 93–114.
  13. 13. Ernest Gellner, Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell, 1983.
  14. 14. Ernesto Laclau, Populism: What’s in a Name? Populism and the Mirror of Democracy.London and New York: Verso, 2005, pp. 32–49.
  15. 15. Jan Jagers and Stefaan Walgrave, Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium’, European Journal of Political Research, 46. 2007, pp. 319–345.
  16. 16. Maureen A. Eger and Sarah Valdez, Neo-Nationalism in Western Europe, European Sociological Review, 31. 2015, pp. 115–130.
  17. 17. Michaelangelo Anastasiou, Of Nation and People: The Discursive Logic of Nationalist Populism, Javnost – The Public, 26. 2019, pp. 330–345.
  18. 18. Nadia Urbinati, Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
  19. 19. Pierre Ostiguy, Populism: A Socio-Cultural Approach, in Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Populism Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 73–98.
  20. 20. Rogers Brubaker, Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 55–76.
  21. 21. Tim Dean, Two Kinds of Other and Their Consequences, Critical Inquiry, 23. 2000., pp. 910–920.
  22. 22. Yannis Stavrakakis and Giorgos Katsambekis, Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA, Journal of Political Ideologies, 19. 2014, pp. 119–142.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.