Otsenka uspevaemosti studentov kak otrazhenie urovnia ikh akademicheskikh dostizhenii (zarubezhnyi opyt)

Proceeding
All-Russian research-to-practice conference with international participation «Pedagogy, Psychology, Society: Current Trends»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian research-to-practice conference with international participation «Pedagogy, Psychology, Society: Current Trends»
Authors:
Anna V. Zaitseva 1 , Svetlana A. Lomokhova 1
Work direction:
Теория и методика профессионального образования
Pages:
93-95
Received: 16 April 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
2211
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Pedagogical Institute named after V. G. Belinsky of FSBEI of HE "Penza State University"
For citation:
Zaitseva A. V., & Lomokhova S. A. (2020). Otsenka uspevaemosti studentov kak otrazhenie urovnia ikh akademicheskikh dostizhenii (zarubezhnyi opyt). Pedagogy, Psychology, Society: Current Trends, 93-95. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

В статье определены критерии оценивания успеваемости студентов высших учебных заведений. Выявлена ключевая роль системы оценки академических достижений обучающихся. Представлена цель высшего образования как выполнение социально-экономического заказа государства.

References

  1. 1. Crosling, G., & Rahman, N. (2009). International Students and Independent Learning. URL: www.researchgate.net
  2. 2. Held, D., McGrew, A. (1999). Global Transformations. Wiley. 544p.
  3. 3. Henderson, J. G., & Kesson, R. K. (2004). Curriculum Wisdom: Educational Decisions in Democratic Societies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  4. 4. Huba, M. E., Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-Centered Assessment on College Campuses: Sifting the Focus from Teaching to Learning. URL: www.researchgate.net
  5. 5. Schwab, J. (2000). Contemporary Curriculum Theoricing: Crisis and Resolution. URL: www.researchgate.net

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.