En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Conference
  3. Psychological and Pedagogical Support of General,...
  4. Osobennosti razvitiia nagliadno-obraznogo myshleni...

Osobennosti razvitiia nagliadno-obraznogo myshleniia u detei starshego doshkol'nogo vozrasta s legkoi stepen'iu umstvennoi otstalosti

Proceeding
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychological and Pedagogical Support of General, Special and Inclusive Education of Children and Adults»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychological and Pedagogical Support of General, Special and Inclusive Education of Children and Adults»
Author:
Anastasiia V. Mel'nikova 1
Work direction:
Problems of psychological safety of the environment in the system of special and inclusive education
Pages:
282-283
Received: 6 April 2022

Rating:
Article accesses:
1204
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Tula State Pedagogical University named after L.N. Tolstoy
For citation:
Mel'nikova A. V. (2022). Osobennosti razvitiia nagliadno-obraznogo myshleniia u detei starshego doshkol'nogo vozrasta s legkoi stepen'iu umstvennoi otstalosti. Psychological and Pedagogical Support of General, Special and Inclusive Education of Children and Adults, 282-283. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

В статье представлен качественный анализ проведенного диагностического исследования по выявлению уровня развития наглядно-образного мышления у старших дошкольников с легкой степенью умственной отсталости.

References

  1. 1. Поддьяков Н.Н. Развитие мышления и умственное воспитание дошкольника / под ред. Н.Н. Поддьякова, А.Ф. Говорковой; Науч.-исслед. ин-т дошкольного воспитания Акад. пед. наук СССР. – М.: Педагогика, 1985. – 200 с.
  2. 2. Стребелева Е.А. Психолого-педагогическая диагностика / Е.А. Стребелева. – М.: Просвещение, 2005 – 161 с.
  3. 3. Лурия А.Р. Умственно отсталый ребенок / А.Р. Лурия. – М.: Просвещение, 1987. – 184 с.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.