Metodika napisaniia statei o predstaviteliakh tatarskoi diaspory v Uzbekistane (na primere entsiklopedii "Tatary Uzbekistana")

Proceeding
All-Russian scientific conference with international participation «Problems of education, history and culture through the prism of the ethnic diversity of Russia (for the 170th anniversary of the Chuvash educator I.Ya. Yakovlev)»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian scientific conference with international participation «Problems of education, history and culture through the prism of the ethnic diversity of Russia (for the 170th anniversary of the Chuvash educator I.Ya. Yakovlev)»
Author:
Liliia T. Nigmiatzianova 1
Work direction:
Межконфессиональные и межэтнические отношения: история и перспективы
Pages:
319-321
Received: 5 April 2018

Rating:
Article accesses:
3631
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 OP GNBU "Akademiia nauk RT" "Institut tatarskoi entsiklopedii i regionovedeniia AN RT"
For citation:
Nigmiatzianova L. T. (2018). Metodika napisaniia statei o predstaviteliakh tatarskoi diaspory v Uzbekistane (na primere entsiklopedii "Tatary Uzbekistana"). Problems of education, history and culture through the prism of the ethnic diversity of Russia (for the 170th anniversary of the Chuvash educator I.Ya. Yakovlev), 319-321. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

В статье рассматриваются научно-методологические принципы создания первого универсального энциклопедического издания о татарской диаспоре Узбекистана. Анализируются принципы построения статей о персоналиях.

References

  1. 1. Татарская энциклопедия: Методические указания. – Казань, 2002.
  2. 2. Татарская энциклопедия. В 6 т. Т. 5. – Казань, 2010. – 736 с.
  3. 3. Татары Казахстана. – Казань, 2016. – 480 с.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.