En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Conference
  3. Problems of education, history and culture through...
  4. I.Ia. Iakovlev i ego otnoshenie k plagiatu

I.Ia. Iakovlev i ego otnoshenie k plagiatu

Proceeding
All-Russian scientific conference with international participation «Problems of education, history and culture through the prism of the ethnic diversity of Russia (for the 170th anniversary of the Chuvash educator I.Ya. Yakovlev)»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian scientific conference with international participation «Problems of education, history and culture through the prism of the ethnic diversity of Russia (for the 170th anniversary of the Chuvash educator I.Ya. Yakovlev)»
Author:
Zinaida N. Iakushkina 1
Work direction:
Роль И.Я. Яковлева в истории развития культуры народов Поволжья
Pages:
78-80
Received: 6 April 2018

Rating:
Article accesses:
3350
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Chuvash State Pedagogical University
For citation:
Iakushkina Z. N. (2018). I.Ia. Iakovlev i ego otnoshenie k plagiatu. Problems of education, history and culture through the prism of the ethnic diversity of Russia (for the 170th anniversary of the Chuvash educator I.Ya. Yakovlev), 78-80. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

В статье раскрывается отношение И. Я. Яковлева к заимствованию чужих произведений авторами научных сочинений, высказанное им в своих воспоминаниях. Автор приходит к выводу, что заимствование результатов чужих трудов И.Я. Яковлев считает злом, повлекшим возмездие и Божью кару.

References

  1. 1. Яковлев И.Я. Моя жизнь: Воспоминания / Вступ. статья Л.П. Куракова, археогр. предисл. Г.Н. Плечова; примеч., имен. указ. Н.Г. Краснова / И.Я. Яковлев. – М.: Республика, 1997. – 696 с.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.