FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL MOTIVES AMONG PHILOLOGY STUDENTS IN THE PROCESS OF THEIR PREPARATION FOR AESTHETIC EDUCATION OF SCHOOLCHILDREN

Proceeding
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Author:
Natalia I. Eshkina 1
Work direction:
Развитие профессиональной компетентности специалистов в области обеспечения безопасного детства
Pages:
284-285
Received: 2 November 2023

Rating:
Article accesses:
859
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Tula State Pedagogical University named after L.N. Tolstoy
For citation:
Eshkina N. I. (2023). FORMATION OF PROFESSIONAL MOTIVES AMONG PHILOLOGY STUDENTS IN THE PROCESS OF THEIR PREPARATION FOR AESTHETIC EDUCATION OF SCHOOLCHILDREN. Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects, 284-285. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

The article discusses the features of the professional formation of students of philology, the formation of professional motivation. The specifics of the formation of professional motives in the process of preparing philology students for the aesthetic education of schoolchildren at a pedagogical university are described. The results of the study are presented.

References

  1. 1. Бордовская Н.В. Педагогика: учебник для вузов / Н.В. Бордовская, А.А. Реан. – СПб.: Питер, 2000 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.prof-diagnost.org/prof_test/prof7.php (дата обращения: 02.11.2023).
  2. 2. Зеер Э.Ф. Психология профессий: учебное пособие для студентов вузов / Э.Ф. Зеер. – 2-е изд., перераб., доп. – М.: Академический Проект; Екатеринбург: Деловая книга, 2003. – 336 с. [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://booksee.org/book/526969 (дата обращения: 02.11.2023). EDN QXGPCR

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.