Analysis of the results of the teachers version questionnaire survey on internationalization in higher education in China

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-116222
Open Access
International Scientific and Practical Conference «Sormovo Readings- 2025: scientific and educational space, realities and prospects for improving the quality of education»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International Scientific and Practical Conference «Sormovo Readings- 2025: scientific and educational space, realities and prospects for improving the quality of education»
Author:
Miao Wang 1
Scientific adviser:
Tat'iana V. Palieva1
Work direction:
Современные педагогические теории и методы: инновации в образовании и подготовка кадров
Pages:
107-111
Received: 28 January 2025

Rating:
Article accesses:
150
Published in:
РИНЦ Информрегистр
1 Mozyrskii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet im. I.P. Shamiakina
For citation:
Wang M. (2025). Analysis of the results of the teachers version questionnaire survey on internationalization in higher education in China. Sormovo Readings- 2025: scientific and educational space, realities and prospects for improving the quality of education, 107-111. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-116222

Abstract

This article presents the results of a teachers survey of higher education in China, aimed at identifying the current state of internationalization processes in higher education; the satisfaction level of the higher education institutions international cooperation, programs and projects; possible ways of improving the processes have been identified.

Funding Agency

Grant Number

References

  1. 1. Knight J. Concepts, Rationales, and Interpretive Frameworks in the Internationalization of Higher Education / J. Knight // The SAGE Handbook of International Higher Education. 2012. P. 27–42.
  2. 2. Marginson S. Hegemonic ideas are not always right: on the definition of «Internationalisation’ of higher education / S. Marginson // Centre for global higher education working papers. 2023. №96. P. 1–45.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.