On the problem of diagnosing the psychological resistance of subjects of the educational space to destructive digital content

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-138865
Open Access
All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation «The Topical Issues of the Humanities and Social Sciences»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation «The Topical Issues of the Humanities and Social Sciences»
Author:
Tatiana G. Khashchenko 1
Work direction:
Развитие психолого-педагогического сопровождения в современном образовании
Pages:
319-321
Received: 21 May 2025

Rating:
Article accesses:
139
Published in:
Информрегистр РИНЦ
1 FGBOU VO "Ul'ianovskii gosudarstvennyi agrarnyi universitet imeni P.A.Stolypina"
For citation:
Khashchenko T. G. (2025). On the problem of diagnosing the psychological resistance of subjects of the educational space to destructive digital content. The Topical Issues of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 319-321. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-138865

Abstract

The article analyzes the state of development of theoretical and methodological foundations for the diagnosis of psychological personality resistance to the effects of destructive information in digital space. Based on the study of relevant domestic and foreign sources, it is concluded that there is a shortage of valid diagnostic tools associated with insufficient knowledge of this type of psychological stability and its specific indicators., With the fragmentary and contradictory data on personal correlates of psychological resistance to destructive factors of the digital environment, a definition of the concept of "psychological resistance to destructive digital content" in its connection with the content of the concepts of psychological stability and destructive information is proposed based on comparison and generalization of published data. The indicators of this stability are described, empirical verified data on its personal predictors are presented and summarized.

References

  1. 1. Прохорова И.Ф. Механизмы сопротивления индивида ложной информации / И.Ф. Прохорова // Международный научно-исследовательский журнал. – 2017. – №4 (58). – С. 164–166. – DOI: https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2017.58.070. EDN YKMPTJ.
  2. 2. Хащенко Т.Г. Новые вызовы и актуальные аспекты проблемы личностной устойчивости подростков к деструктивному информационному воздействию / Т.Г. Хащенко // Вестник Калужского университета. Серия 1. Психологические науки. Педагогические науки. – 2022. – №2 (15). – С. 85–93. – DOI: 10.54072/26586568_2022_5_2_85. EDN MXIXQM.
  3. 3. Погожина И.Н., Подольский А.И., Идобаева О.А., Подольская Т.А. Цифровое поведение и особенности мотивационной сферы интернет-пользователей: логико-категориальный анализ // Вопросы образования. – 2020. – №3. – С. 62. DOI 10.17323/1814–9545–2020–3-60–94. EDN IBZGEA.
  4. 4. Chaiken S. Beyond accuracy: defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing / S. Chaiken, R. Giner-Sorolla, S. Chert // The psychology of action: linking cognition and motivation to behavior. – NY: Guilford Press, 1996. – P. 553–578.
  5. 5. Cornwell J.F. M. and Higgins, E. T. The tripartite motivational essence of man: Value, Control and Truth working together / J.F. M. Cornwell, E.T. Higgins // Oxford Handbook of the Essence of Man /edited by M. van Someren and J. F. Dovidio. – NY: Oxford University Press, 2018. – P. 71–81.
  6. 6. Denisova E. et al. Psychological and genetic characteristics and strategies of students’ digital behavior in the context of the formation of the digital ecosystem // BIO Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences. 2024. Vol. 84. P. 04036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/BIOCONF/20248404036. EDN DALLMK
  7. 7. Ecker, Ullrich K.H. The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction // Nature Reviews Psychology. 2022. Vol. 1.1. – P. 13–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159–021–00006-y. EDN DQUPGY
  8. 8. Hidalgo-Fuentes S. Uso problemático del smartphone: elpapel de los Cinco Grandes, la TríadaOscura y la impulsividad // Aloma: revista de psicologia, ciències de l'educaciói de l esport. 2021. Vol. 39. №1. P. 17–26 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://revistaaloma.blanquerna.edu/index.php/aloma/article/view/480 (дата обращения: 05.02.2025). – DOI:10.51698/aloma.2021.39.1.17–26. – EDN ODTGCR
  9. 9. Kaufman R. WARNING This Contains Misinformation: The Effect of Cognitive Factors, Beliefs, and Personality on Misinformation Warning Tag Attitudes/ R.Kaufman, A. Broukhim, M. Haupt. // arXiv. 2024. – DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.02710
  10. 10. Kwek A. Distractions, analytical thinking and falling for fake news: A survey of psychological factors // Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023. Vol. 10. №. 1. P. 1–12. DOI 10.1057/s41599-023-01813-9. EDN GPMTMD
  11. 11. Martel, C. Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news / C. Martel, G. Pennycook, D.G. Rand // Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 2020. Vol. 5 (1). – P. 1–20. – DOI: 10.1186/s41235–020–00252–3/. EDN ZHJAFR
  12. 12. Preston, S. et al. Correction: Detecting fake news on Facebook: The role of emotional intelligence // PLOS ONE. – Vol. 16 (10). – P. e0258719 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://clck.ru/3MHJPu (дата обращения 10.05.2025). – DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258719. EDN UNLNBP
  13. 13. Prisăcaru, A. The Mediating Role of Cognitions and Locus of Control in the Management of Emotional States Induced by «Fake News» in a Group of Students // International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies. 2024. Vol. 4. Issue 3. P. 320–329.
  14. 14. Sarno D.M. Who gets caught in the Web of lies? Understanding susceptibility to phishing emails, fake news headlines, and scam text messages // Human Factors. – 2024. Vol. 66. №6. P. 1742–1753.
  15. 15. Sharot T. How people decide what they want to know // Nat. Hum. Behav. 2020. №4. Pр.14–19. – DOI: 10.1038/s41562–019–0793–1. EDN AEXCUX
  16. 16. Zhou Y and Shen L Processing of misinformation as motivational and cognitive biases // Frontiers in Psychology. 2024. Vol. 15. Р. 1430953 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39282675/ (дата обращения 14.05.2025) – DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430953.
  17. 17. Wolverton C., Stevens D. The impact of personality in recognizing dis-information // Online Information Review. 2020. Т. 44. №1. P.181–191 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/oir-04–2019–0115/full/html (дата обращение 15.05.2025).

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.