En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Monograph
  3. Education and science: current trends
  4. Komparativnye issledovaniia sistem vysshego obrazo...

Komparativnye issledovaniia sistem vysshego obrazovaniia: analiticheskii obzor dostizhenii i tendentsii

Book Chapter
Коллективная монография «Education and science: current trends»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Коллективная монография «Education and science: current trends»
Author:
Olga A. Burukina 1
Work direction:
Парадигмы современного образования
Pages:
83-96
Received: 24 December 2018

Rating:
Article accesses:
4185
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Russian State Social University
For citation:

Abstract

The work covers theoretical and practical aspects of comparative studies in education systems. Aiming at acquainting the readers of the journal with the fundamentals of comparative studies in higher education systems, the author describes basic levels, principles, methods, aims and tasks, as well as the streamlines of comparative studies in the sphere. The author analyzes comparative studies of different levels conducted by foreign researchers for the last 15 years identifying research streamlines (including comparative researches of higher school administrations, distant education, ECTS and other credit systems), their key characteristics, their advantages and prospects. The researcher also determines the aggregate subject of comparative studies in higher education systems at the initial level; formulateы tasks, set before the Russian comparative researchers of higher education systems and highlights possible ways to solve them.

References

  1. 1. Марков Ю.Г. Функциональный подход в современном научном познании. – Новосибирск: Наука, 1982. – 255 с.
  2. 2. Мусиенко Т.В. Системный подход как теоретическая основа компаративного исследования микрополитики / Т.В. Мусиенко, В.Н. Лукин // CREDO NEW. Теоретический журнал. – 2003. – №2 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://gzvon.pyramid.volia.ua/biblioteka/kafedra_filosofii/libph/sb/credo/credonew/ 02_03/8.htm (дата обращения: 09.10.2018).
  3. 3. Anitha B.K. Comparative Study of Higher Educational Institutions in India / The National Institute of Advanced Studies. Indian Institute of Advanced Studies. – Bangalore, 2009.
  4. 4. Bertalanffy L.Von. General System Theory // Braziller. – N. Y., 1968.
  5. 5. Bowen Frank M. State Structures for the Governance of HE / Bowen, Frank M., Bracco, Kathy Reeves, Callan, Patrick M., Finney, Joni E., Richardson, Richard C., Jr., Trombley, William // The California Higher Education Policy Center. –1997.
  6. 6. Dalichow F. A Comparative Study of Academic Credit Systems in an International Context // Journal of Studies in International Education. – 1997. – Vol. 1. – №2. – P. 21–32.
  7. 7. Ding X. A Comparative Study of Distance Higher Education Systems in Australia and China. Fern Univ., Hagen (Germany). Institute for Research into Distance Education. – 1999.
  8. 8. D&CU 2002 – Distance and Campus Universities: Tensions and Interactions. A Comparative Study of Five Countries. Published for the International Association of Universities (IAU) Press by Pergamon // Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE. – November 2002. – Vol. 3. – №4.
  9. 9. Hager M. Studieren mit Kindern – Der Balanceakt zwischen Küche und Hörsaal, unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit. – Wien, 2001.
  10. 10. HEinT 2009 – Higher Education in Turkey: A Comparative Study // The Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research (SETA) [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.setav.org/lang_en/index.php?option= com_content& task=view&id=1&Itemid=21 (дата обращения: 15.10.2018).
  11. 11. Huisman J. Fixed and Fuzzy Boundaries in Higher Education: a comparative study of (binary) structures in nine countries / J. Huisman, F. Kaiser eds. // AWT-Achtergrondstudie 19 (19). Adviesraad voor het Wetenschaps-en Technologiebeleid, Den Haag. – 2001.
  12. 12. Kogan M. Transforming Higher Education: A Comparative Study. Series: Higher Education Dynamics / M. Kogan, M. Henkel, I. Bleiklie, M. Bauer. – 2006. – Vol.
  13. 13. Kogan M. Originally published by J. Kingsley Publishers / M. Kogan, M. Bauer, I. Bleiklie, M. Henkel (Eds.). – London, 2000. – 2nd ed. – 2006. – XIV. – 203 p.
  14. 14. Macha H. Akademikerin, Mutter / H. Macha, W. Jung // Spiegel Online. – 2002 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.spiegel.de/unispiegel/ jobundberuf/0,1518,226728,00.Html (дата обращения: 01.11.2018).
  15. 15. O’Laughlin (2005). Balancing Parenthood and Academia: Work/Family Stress as Influenced by Gender and Tenure Status / O’Laughlin, M. Elizabeth, L.G. Bischoff // Journal of Family Issues. – January 2005. – №1.
  16. 16. Roy S. A Comparative Study of Higher Education Expansion Policy in China and India: Theory and Practice / University of Delhi, India. Lecture at Centre for International Education and Exchange, National Chengchi University. – Taiwan, 2008.
  17. 17. Sakurai Y. A Comparative Study of Higher Education in Thailand and Japan: Several Issues Regarding the Independent State University Administrative Corporations / Graduate School of Letters, Hokkaido University, Japan. – 2009 [Электронный ресурс]. – Режим доступа: http://www.hucc.hokudai.ac.jp/ ~n16260/pdf2004/educom2002thaihighereducation.pdf (дата обращения: 12.10.2018).
  18. 18. Schwarz S. Accreditation and Evaluation in the European Higher Education Area / S. Schwarz, D.F. Westerheijden // Springer. – 2007. – 507 p.
  19. 19. Sellner M. Studieren mit Kind – Chancen und Risiken: unpublished thesis. – Wien, 2002.
  20. 20. SinHE 2007 – Stratification in Higher Education. A Comparative Study / Edited by Yossi Shavit, Richard Arum and Adam Gamoran. – 2007. – 504 p.
  21. 21. Wroblewski U. Studieren mit Kind // IHS Sozialerhebung. – Wien, 2002.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.