LINGUISTIC PECULIARITIES OF PUN, ITS TYPOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-32974
Open Access
Сollection of articles «Education, innovation, research as a resource for community development»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Сollection of articles «Education, innovation, research as a resource for community development»
Author:
Anastasiia S. Igasheva 1
Work direction:
Национальное образование: языкознание, языковая культура
Pages:
170-175
Received: 10 June 2019

Rating:
Article accesses:
4837
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 FGBOU VO "Ural'skii gosudarstvennyi pedagogicheskii universitet"
For citation:
Igasheva A. S. (2019). LINGUISTIC PECULIARITIES OF PUN, ITS TYPOLOGY AND CLASSIFICATION. Education, innovation, research as a resource for community development, 170-175. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-32974

Abstract

This article is focuses on the analysis of pun as one of the categories of wordplay its manifestation in one-liner jokes in English. The data of this study is all of one-line jokes containing puns which were collected on fiction material and online sources. Based on the analysis of various classifications, a new pun classification is defined as one of the types of word games.

References

  1. 1. Attardo, S. Linguistic Theories of Humour. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1994.
  2. 2. Augarde, Tony. The Oxford Guide to Word Games, 2nd ed., Oxford: OUP, 2003.
  3. 3. Clark David Allen, Jokes, Pun and Riddles. Garden City, New York: Doubleday, 1968.
  4. 4. Delabastita, D: Wordplay and Translation: Introduction, 1996.
  5. 5. Gottlieb, Henrik: “You Got the Picture?” On the Polysemiotics of Subtitling Wordplay. Copenhagen, 2005.
  6. 6. Koponen. This view is of the Hardcover edition from Oxford University Press, USA, 2004.
  7. 7. Leppihalme, R. Culture Bumps: An Empirical Approach to theTranslation of Allusions. Clevedon : Multilingual Matters Ltd, 1997.
  8. 8. Raskin, V. Semantic Mechanisms of Humor (Dordrecht: Reidel) Pub, 1985.
  9. 9. Redfern, W. Puns. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.