Revisiting the Question of Choosing Diagnostic Tools for Identification of Gifted Children

Proceeding
All-Russian research-to-practice conference with international participation «Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Talented Children: Problems, Directions, Approaches, Conditions»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian research-to-practice conference with international participation «Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Talented Children: Problems, Directions, Approaches, Conditions»
Authors:
Viktoriya A. Averina 1 , Olga A. Gerasimenko 1
Scientific adviser:
Elena V. Panferova1
Work direction:
Проблемы диагностики и выявления одаренных детей
Pages:
48-51
Received: 8 April 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
3510
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Tula State Pedagogical University named after L.N. Tolstoy
For citation:
Averina V. A., & Gerasimenko O. A. (2020). Revisiting the Question of Choosing Diagnostic Tools for Identification of Gifted Children. Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Talented Children: Problems, Directions, Approaches, Conditions, 48-51. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of diagnosing the signs of giftedness in children. The need and importance of detecting a child's unique and individual abilities is noted, as well as the special features of work with gifted children is described. The key points that should be paid attention to when choosing the direction of diagnostic material for detecting giftedness in children are emphasized.

References

  1. 1. Atlasova, Ia. P., & Vasil'chenko, L. F. (2014). Odarennye deti: sbornik metodik po vyiavleniiu sposobnostei i odarennosti detei. SPb.
  2. 2. Leitesa, N. S. (1996). Psikhologiia odarennosti detei i podrostkov., 416. M.: Izdatel'skii tsentr "Akademiia".
  3. 3. Lemeshevskaia, M. A. (2011). Problema vyiavleniia odarennykh detei v shkole. Odarennyi rebenok, 1.
  4. 4. Monks, F. (2014). Odarennye deti. M.
  5. 5. Savenkov, A. I. Odarennye deti v detskom sadu i shkole., 232.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.