En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Conference
  3. Topical issues of law, economic and management
  4. The COVID-19 Pandemic, electoral process and the U...

The COVID-19 Pandemic, electoral process and the US Supreme Court Practice

Proceeding
All-Russian scientific and practical conference «Topical issues of law, economic and management»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian scientific and practical conference «Topical issues of law, economic and management»
Author:
Boris V. Nikolaev 1
Work direction:
Конституционное и муниципальное право
Pages:
136-138
Received: 1 May 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
2739
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 FSBEI of HE "Penza State University"
For citation:
Nikolaev B. V. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic, electoral process and the US Supreme Court Practice. Topical issues of law, economic and management, 136-138. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

The article discusses the main directions of the latest practice of the US Supreme Court on the issues of suffrage and the process, which is of particular importance during the general elections in the USA held in 2020. The development of the pandemic has had a major impact on the 2020 election campaign and sparked a series of state-level litigation, as well as the US Supreme Court interference in the process. The article analyzes the positions of a divided Court in the framework of the relevant case.

Acknowledgments

Статья подготовлена при финансовой поддержке РФФИ и Пензенской области, грант «Основные тенденции развития избирательного права и практики его применения на региональном уровне: опыт России и США» 18-411-580003\18 р_а.

References

  1. 1. Changes to ballot measure campaigns, procedures, and policies in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, 2020. URL: https://ballotpedia.org/Changes_to_ballot_measure_campaigns,_procedures,_and_policies_in_response_to_the_coronavirus_(COVID-19)_pandemic,_202
  2. 2. Republican National Committee et al. v. Democratic National Committee et al. April 6, 2020. 589 U. S. __ (2020).
  3. 3. Rucho v. Common Cause, №18–422, 588 U.S. __ (2019).
  4. 4. Николаев Б.В. Система источников избирательного права в США / Б.В. Николаев // Известия вузов. Поволжский регион. Общественные науки. – 2018. – №4. – С. 59–70.
  5. 5. Николаев Б.В. Правовые основы и практика назначения судей Верховного суда США / Б.В. Николаев // Известия вузов. Поволжский регион. Общественные науки. – 2016. – №4. – С. 29–38.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.