Examination of Game-Playing Handbooks. Which Toys Cure and Which Ones Harm?

Proceeding
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects»
Author:
Aleksandr S. Galanov 1
Work direction:
Creating a psychologically comfortable and safe educational environment: technologies, diagnostics, practice, expertise
Pages:
91-100
Received: 29 October 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
1635
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Preschool Educational Project "Doshkola.ru"
For citation:
Galanov A. S. (2020). Examination of Game-Playing Handbooks. Which Toys Cure and Which Ones Harm?. Psychologically Safe Educational Environment: Design Problems and Development Prospects, 91-100. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

The article provides groudning for a new look at the psychological examination of game-playing handbooks, taking into account the criteria for organizing a subject-developing environment. Variants of constructors and other game-playing handbooks for the development of the abilities of preschoolers are presented.

References

  1. 1. Alekseeva, S.M. Further education program «Digital Laboratory – Naurasha». The level of development of the program: introductory [Electronic resource] / S. М. Alekseeva // Access mode: https://sch556u.mskobr.ru/attach_files/upload_users_files/5dce0d01bc77b.pdf (date accessed: 29.10.2020).
  2. 2. Methodical recommendations to the designers «Polydron». – Moscow: Exam, 2017.
  3. 3. Methodological manual for the set «Magnetic 3D blocks». Federal State Educational Standard of Preschool Education. – Moscow: Exam, 2017.
  4. 4. Educational project «Doshkolka» [Electronic resource] / Access mode: http://www.doshkolka.ru/ (date of access: 29.10.2020).

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.