En
Register Log in

List of publications on a keyword: «анализирующее наблюдение»

  • Activation of the analyzing observation using the technique "What is missing in these drawings?" in children aged 5-6 years with mental retardation

    Proceeding
    Pedagogy, Psychology, Society: from theory to practice
    Authors:
    Tatiana A. Fominkova, Oksana M. Kovalenko
    Work direction:
    Коррекционная педагогика
    Abstract:
    The article examines such features peculiar to children with cerebral-organic ZPR, as a decrease in mental tone, insufficient analytical observation, difficulties in updating existing knowledge. The results of the implementation of the technique "What is missing in these drawings?" in the version of R.S. Nemov are described. The presented results are summarized on the basis of the maximum and minimum quantitative difference between the indicators of normally developing children and children with ASD. The results of this technique make it possible to differentiate 5-6-year-old children with cerebral-organic SPD into groups. This technique can also be successfully used by parents.
    Keywords:
    mental retardation of cerebral organic genesis, children aged 5-6 years, analytical observation, the technique "What is missing in these drawings?"
    Go 

  • Peculiarities of the Spot the Nonsense method performance in 5-year-old children with level III general delay in speech development. (report 1)

    Research Article
    Development of education Volume 6 No 1
    Author:
    Oksana M. Kovalenko
    Work direction:
    Psychology in Education
    Abstract:
    The introduction describes the features of thinking, perception and analyzing observation of children with ONR, which make it difficult to correctly analyze and evaluate visual information. The research methodology is the task «Nelepies» in the version presented by R.S. Nemov. The results of the study provide generalized quantitative results for individual absurdities. Qualitative analysis captures the correct answers and reveals the mechanisms of children's erroneous answers. Qualitative characteristics of the analysis carried out by normally developing children and children with OHP (III level) aged 5 years when considering this image are presented: options for explaining inconsistencies (whether everything is drawn correctly) and options for clarifying answers (how it should actually be). For each option for explaining and clarifying discrepancies, generalized quantitative data and a quantitative difference between the results of normally developing children and children with OHP (III level) are given. All variants of explanations and clarifications are illustrated by the children's answers and presented in accordance with the quantitative difference between the indicators of children with normal speech development and GR (III level). At the same time, variants with a quantitative predominance in the norm, variants with a quantitative predominance in OHP (level III) and variants that are noted only in OHP (level III) are indicated. In conclusion, a sequence of established options for explanations and clarifications is presented in terms of the degree of quantitative difference between the indicators of normally developing children and children with OHP (level III) from a larger difference to a smaller one.
    Keywords:
    Perception, general delay in speech development, 5-year-old children, visual thinking, analyzing observation, the method of “nonsense”
    Go