The problem of frustration tolerance as the basis of emotional stability of teachers

Proceeding
International Research-to-practice conference «Primary education in the new reality: trends of development, current problems, best practices»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International Research-to-practice conference «Primary education in the new reality: trends of development, current problems, best practices»
Author:
Uliana S. Alismanova 1
Scientific adviser:
Elena V. Panferova1
Work direction:
Well-Being and Security of a Person in Contemporary Educational Environment
Pages:
15-18
Received: 19 October 2023

Rating:
Article accesses:
591
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Tula State Pedagogical University named after L.N. Tolstoy
For citation:
Alismanova U. S. (2023). The problem of frustration tolerance as the basis of emotional stability of teachers. Primary education in the new reality: trends of development, current problems, best practices, 15-18. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

The article considers the factors of psychological stability of a teacher. Definitions of tolerance and frustration tolerance, as well as its forms are given. Psychotherapeutic techniques for increasing the level of frustration tolerance and emotional stability of a person in the conditions of professional activity of a teacher are described. It is noted that the formation of frustration tolerance is a condition for the emotional stability of teachers.

References

  1. 1. Захаров Н.П. Способ повышения психологической толерантности и стрессоустойчивости / Н.П. Захаров (Патент RU 2233179).
  2. 2. Казанская В.Г. Педагогическая психология / В.Г. Казанская. – СПб.: Питер, 2005. – С. 244–256.
  3. 3. Конюхов Н.И. Словарь-справочник по психологии / Н.И. Конюхов. – М., 1996. – 146 с.
  4. 4. Митина Л.М. Психология труда и профессионального развития учителя / Л.М. Митина. – М.: Академия, 2004. – С. 87–92. EDN QTJOBP
  5. 5. Розенцвейг С. Психодиагностика / С. Розенцвейг. – М., 2004. – 388 с.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.