Nastavnichestvo v studencheskoi srede v meditsinskom vuze: sushchestvuiushchie problemy studencheskogo i prepodavatel'skogo nastavnichestva

Book Chapter
DOI: 10.31483/r-108799
Open Access
Monograph «Pedagogy and Psychology of Modern Education»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
Monograph «Pedagogy and Psychology of Modern Education»
Authors:
Dmitrii V. Sudakov 1 , Oleg V. Sudakov 1 , Olga I. Gordeeva 1 , Galina V. Sych 1
Work direction:
Глава 6
Pages:
113-126
Received: 14 November 2023

Rating:
Article accesses:
979
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 FSBEI of HE “N.N. Burdenko Voronezh State Medical University” of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation
For citation:

Abstract

The chapter discusses the issue of mentoring in a medical school. This topic is very relevant due to the fact that the process of forming a new doctor as a specialist is not only one of the priority tasks of the social sphere and medicine in particular, but also an important task for the state as a whole. Since ancient times, the deepest knowledge and experience have been passed on from mentor to student – future physician. Recently, in addition to pedagogical mentoring, student mentoring has begun to emerge in the world. However, the continuation of the existence of mentoring and its development is impossible without identifying possible difficulties and problems, which was the goal of the presented work. The subjects of the study were 150 people – students and teachers of VSMU named after. N.N. Burdenko. Group 1 included 50 1st year students of the Faculty of Medicine; group 2 – 50 6th year students of the Faculty of Medicine; Group 3 – 50 university teachers from various departments. After processing and assessing the gender and age composition, the subjects were asked to evaluate various aspects related to mentoring, in particular – the level of awareness of mentoring, both pedagogical and student; determine the need for mentoring of both types in general and assess their impact on the educational process and on the choice of further specialty. The final part of the study was an analysis of various problems associated with both pedagogical and student mentoring. The data obtained allow to take a fresh look at mentoring in general and at existing problems, and to think about possible ways to solve them. This article may be of some interest to higher education teachers and medical university teachers involved in mentoring, as well as participating in the formation of student mentoring.

References

  1. 1. Двуединая дисциплина в системе высшего медицинского образования России / А.В. Черных [и др.] // Журнал анатомии и гистопатологии. – 2017. – №S. – С. 48.
  2. 2. Значение внутривузовских и межвузовских студенческих олимпиад по хирургии в становлении будущего врача / Ю.В. Малеев [и др.] // Журнал анатомии и гистопатологии. – 2017. – №S. – С. 27–28.
  3. 3. Значение студенческого научного кружка кафедры оперативной хирургии с топографической анатомией в формировании будущего врача / Ю.В. Малеев [и др.] // Вестник Российской военно-медицинской академии. – 2015. – №S2. – С. 101–102.
  4. 4. Попов В.И. Оценка психологического здоровья студентов медицинского вуза / В.И. Попов [и др.] // Здоровье молодежи: новые вызовы и перспективы. – М., 2019. – С. 110–126. – EDN RGOQMJ
  5. 5. Проблемы совершенствования и оптимизации учебного процесса в медицинском вузе / В.И. Попов, И.И. Либина, О.И. Губина // Здоровье – основа человеческого потенциала – проблемы и пути их решения. – 2010. – Т. 5. №1. – С. 185–186. EDN SGQTIH
  6. 6. Судаков Д.В. О психологической адаптации студентов медицинского вуза к дистанционному процессу обучения во время пандемии новой коронавирусной инфекции / Д.В. Судаков, О.В. Судаков, Н.В. Якушева [и др.] // Актуальные вопросы педагогики и психологии: монография / гл. ред. Ж.В. Мурзина. – Чебоксары: Среда, 2021. – С. 133–144. – ISBN 978-5-907313-98-9. doi:10.31483/r-97885. EDN RUMSZV

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.