A generalized model of cognitive-behavioural coaching competencies

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-127473
Open Access
Published in:
All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference «Coaching psychology: methodology, theory, practice»
Author:
Aleksei I. Ezhikov 1
Work direction:
Security of educational activities during quarantine measures
Pages:
103-107
Received: 30 March 2025

Rating:
Article accesses:
257
Published in:
Информрегистр РИНЦ
1 Assotsiatsiia kognitivno-povedencheskoi psikhoterapii
For citation:
Ezhikov A. I. (2025). A generalized model of cognitive-behavioural coaching competencies. Coaching psychology: methodology, theory, practice, 103-107. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-127473

Abstract

This article presents a generalized competency model for cognitive-behavioral coaches (GCM CBC) developed through the synthesis of existing coaching competency models, including international (ICF, EMCC, IAC, AC) and Russian-language frameworks (ARC, NFPMC), as well as the Beck Institute's Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale (CTRS), while accounting for the specific characteristics of the cognitive-behavioral approach in coaching. The development methodology employed semantic analysis and clustering of behavioral indicators, resulting in the identification of four key competency clusters manifested within coaching sessions: goal orientation, interpersonal interaction, interventions, and process, as well as two clusters manifested outside sessions. The developed model may serve as a foundation for standardizing professional training of cognitive-behavioral coaches, developing certification programs, and ensuring quality assurance in practice.

References

  1. 1. Affrunti N.W., Creed T.A. The Factor Structure of the Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale (CTRS) in a Sample of Community Mental Health Clinicians // Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2019. Vol. 43. №3. P. 642–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-019-09998-7. EDN: EGLLPL
  2. 2. Birknerova Z., Misko D., Zbihlejova L. (2022). Determining the Core Competencies of a Coach: Design and Validation of a New Methodology // Behavioral Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13. №1. Art.18. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010018. EDN: KLTOQK
  3. 3. Blumberg K.M. Executive Coaching Competencies: A Review and Critique With Implications for Coach Education // Journal of Psychological Issues in Organizational Culture. 2014. Vol. 5. №2. P. 87–97.
  4. 4. Boyatzis R.E. Competencies in the 21st Century // Journal of Management Development. 2008. Vol. 27. №1. P. 5–12.
  5. 5. Campion M.A. [et al.]. Doing Competencies Well: Best Practices in Competency Modeling // Personnel Psychology. 2011. Vol. 64. №1. P. 225–262.
  6. 6. Cernuşca L., Dima C. Competency and Human Resource Management. 2008 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Competency-and-Human-Resource-Management-Cernușca-Dima/71c935636c21e8f8e1fa08849dbab0cf006be8f5 (дата обращения: 25.03.2025).
  7. 7. Chouhan V.S., Srivastava S. Understanding Competencies and Competency Modeling: A Literature Survey // IOSR Journal of Business and Management. 2014. Vol. 16. №1. P. 14–22.
  8. 8. DiGirolamo J.A. [et al.]. Development of a Coaching Competency Framework. International Coaching Federation, 2024. Ver. 1.00; rev. 2024.09.21. 34 p.
  9. 9. Goldberg S.B. [et al.]. The Structure of Competence: Evaluating the Factor Structure of the Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale // Behavior Therapy. 2020. Vol. 51. №1. P. 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2019.05.008. EDN: VBRTRK
  10. 10. Griffiths K., Campbell M. Regulating the Regulators: Paving the Way for International, Evidence-Based Coaching Standards // International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring. 2008. Vol. 6. №1. P. 19–31.
  11. 11. Lai Y.-L., McDowall A. Understanding Coaching Through Competency – Focusing on an Effective Coaching Relationship // EMCC 6th International Mentoring and Coaching Research Conference. Budapest, 2016.
  12. 12. Maltbia T.E., Marsick V.J., Ghosh R. Executive and Organizational Coaching: A Review of Insights Drawn From Literature to Inform HRD Practice // Advances in Developing Human Resources. 2014. Vol. 16. №2. P. 161–183.
  13. 13. McClelland D.C. Testing for Competence Rather Than for «Intelligence» // American Psychologist. Vol. 28. №1. P. 1–14.
  14. 14. McClelland D.C., Boyatzis R.E. Opportunities for Counselors from the Competency Assessment Movement // The Personnel and Guidance Journal. 1980. Vol. 58. №5. P. 368–372.
  15. 15. Prahalad C.K., Hamel G. The Core Competence of the Corporation // Harvard Business Review. 1990. May-June. P. 275–292.
  16. 16. Vandaveer V.V. [et al.]. A Practice Analysis of Coaching Psychology: Toward a Foundational Competency Model // Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research. 2016. Vol. 68. №2. P. 118–142.
  17. 17. Von Treuer K.M., Reynolds N. A Competency Model of Psychology Practice: Articulating Complex Skills and Practices // Frontiers in Education. 2017. Vol. 2. Art. 54.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.