Development of Children’s Creative Activity in the Context of Supra-Situational Decisions as a Stimulation Factor of Various Types of Giftedness

Proceeding
All-Russian research-to-practice conference with international participation «Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Talented Children: Problems, Directions, Approaches, Conditions»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian research-to-practice conference with international participation «Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Talented Children: Problems, Directions, Approaches, Conditions»
Author:
Olga V. Soldatova 1
Work direction:
Обучение, воспитание и развитие одаренных детей в образовательных учреждениях разного типа
Pages:
117-123
Received: 4 April 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
2190
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Grodnenskii gosudarstvennyi universitet im. Ianki Kupaly
For citation:
Soldatova O. V. (2020). Development of Children’s Creative Activity in the Context of Supra-Situational Decisions as a Stimulation Factor of Various Types of Giftedness. Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Talented Children: Problems, Directions, Approaches, Conditions, 117-123. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

The concept of "giftedness" is analyzed in the article. The problems and forms of stimulation of various types of giftedness in the Republic of Belarus are considered. The development of children's creative activity in the context of supra-situational decisions is highlighted as an effective factor. The following research methods as the method of contradictory (dialectic) situations, the methods of inclusion, the method of problem situations, the person-application method, the methods of optimizing relationships are the necessary methodological tools in the development of gifted children.

References

  1. 1. Bogoiavlenskaia, D. B. (2003). Rabochaia kontseptsiia odarennosti. M. Retrieved from http://psychlib.ru/mgppu/rko/rko-001-.htm#
  2. 2. Matiushkina, A. M. (2004). Odarennost' i vozrast. Razvitie tvorcheskogo potentsiala odarennykh detei: ucheb. posobie., 192. M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo psikhologo-sotsial'nogo in-ta; Voronezh: Modek.
  3. 3. Petrovskii, V. A. (1996). Lichnost' v psikhologii: paradigma subektnosti., 512. Rostov n/D: Feniks.
  4. 4. Savenkov, A. I. (2004). Odarennye deti i tvorcheskie liudi: osobennosti psikhicheskogo razvitiia. Shkol'nyi psikholog, 30. Retrieved from https://psy.1sept.ru/article.php?ID=200403006
  5. 5. Savenkov, A. I. (2000). Odarennye deti v detskom sadu i shkole: ucheb. posobie., 232. M.: Akademiia.
  6. 6. Larionov, T. V., Larionova, T. V., & Volgina, A. M. (2008). Vidy odarennosti detei i kriterii ee vyiavleniia. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskii zhurnal Gaudeamus, 1. Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/vidy-odarennosti-detey-i-kriterii-ee-vyyavleniya
  7. 7. Savenkov, A. I. (2005). Issledovatel'skie metody obucheniia v doshkol'nom obrazovanii. Doshkol'noe vospitanie, 12, 3-11.
  8. 8. Landau, E. (2002). Odarennost' trebuet muzhestva: psikhologicheskoe soprovozhdenie odarennogo rebenka., 144. Landau;; Golubeva;; M.: Akademiia.
  9. 9. Kashapov, M. M. (2006). Psikhologiia tvorcheskogo myshleniia professionala: monografiia., 688. M.: Perse.
  10. 10. Veraksa, N. E. (1987). Razvitie predposylok dialekticheskogo myshleniia v doshkol'nom vozraste. Voprosy psikhologii, 4, 135-139.
  11. 11. Ermakova, E. S. (1999). Formirovanie gibkosti myshleniia u doshkol'nikov. Voprosy psikhologii, 4, 28-34.
  12. 12. Veraksa, N. E. (1990). Dialekticheskoe myshlenie i tvorchestvo. Voprosy psikhologii, 4, 5-14.
  13. 13. D'iachenko, O. M. (1986). Voobrazhenie doshkol'nika., 96. M.: Znanie.
  14. 14. Bukharova, I. S. (2005). Problemnyi podkhod v razvitii neadaptivnoi aktivnosti starshikh doshkol'nikov. Ekaterinburg.
  15. 15. Ermokhina, O. N. (2006). Formirovanie nadsituativnoi poznavatel'noi aktivnosti shkol'nikov (na primere obucheniia inostrannomu iazyku uchashchikhsia sel'skoi shkoly). Ul'ianovsk.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.