En
Register Log in
  1. Main
  2. Conference
  3. Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Talented...
  4. Self-Esteem of Gifted Primary School Children

Self-Esteem of Gifted Primary School Children

Proceeding
All-Russian research-to-practice conference with international participation «Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Talented Children: Problems, Directions, Approaches, Conditions»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian research-to-practice conference with international participation «Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Talented Children: Problems, Directions, Approaches, Conditions»
Authors:
Natalia S. Bobrovnikova 1 , Anastasia S. Bolshakova 1
Work direction:
Обучение, воспитание и развитие одаренных детей в образовательных учреждениях разного типа
Pages:
85-90
Received: 7 April 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
3135
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Tula State Pedagogical University named after L.N. Tolstoy
For citation:
Bobrovnikova N. S., & Bolshakova A. S. (2020). Self-Esteem of Gifted Primary School Children. Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Talented Children: Problems, Directions, Approaches, Conditions, 85-90. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda".

Abstract

In the modern educational process, a significant role should be given to psychological and pedagogical support for gifted children, because in the school environment, their self-esteem often becomes inadequate. Creating a psychologically safe environment, pedagogical conditions, and the correct relationship between teachers and pupils is the task of the school team to maintain normal self-esteem of gifted pupils. The problem is particularly evident in primary school age when moving to a new social environment, so the work of teachers and psychologists at this age stage should be particularly detailed.

References

  1. 1. Vygotskii, L. S. Problemy vozrastnoi periodizatsii detskogo razvitiia. Voprosy psikhologii, 2, 1972, 76 s.
  2. 2. Vygotskii, L. S. (2005). Psikhologiia razvitiia cheloveka., 1136. M.: Eksmo.
  3. 3. Gardner, G. (2007). Struktura razuma: teoriia mnozhestvennogo intellekta., 512. M.: OOO "I.D. Vil'iams".
  4. 4. Leont'ev, A. N. (1983). Izbrannye psikhologicheskie proizvedeniia., 392. M.: Pedagogika.
  5. 5. Madden, E. (2012). "Shest'" za uprazhnenie, ili Odarennyi rebenok. Partner, 11, 4.
  6. 6. Machekhin, A. E. (2002). V poiskakh smysla. Mudrost' tysiacheletii., 912. M.: Olma-Press.
  7. 7. Monks, F. (2014). Odarennye deti., 150. M.: Kogito-tsentr.
  8. 8. Mukhina, V. S. (1999). Vozrastnaia psikhologiia., 456. M.: Akademiia.
  9. 9. Burmenskoi, G. B., & Slutskogo, V. A. (1991). Odarennye deti., 376. M.: Progress.
  10. 10. (1991). Rabochaia kniga shkol'nogo psikhologa., 303. M.: Prosveshchenie.
  11. 11. Savenkov, A. I. (2010). Psikhologiia detskoi odarennosti., 448. M.: Genezis.
  12. 12. Siniagina, N. Iu. (2008). Iz vystupleniia na plenarnom zasedanii Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii "Opyt raboty s odarennymi det'mi v sovremennoi Rossii". Stavropol'.
  13. 13. Teplov, B. M. (1982). Sposobnosti i odarennost'. Psikhologiia individual'nykh razlichii. Teksty, 136. M.: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta.
  14. 14. Tsoi, A. B. (2010). Izuchenie samootsenok intellektual'nykh sposobnostei starsheklassnikov. Molodye uchenye, stolichnomu obrazovaniiu: materialy IX nauchno, 321-326. M.: MGPPU.
  15. 15. Shumakova, N. B. (2018). Spetsifika i problemy razvitiia odarennykh detei v mladshem shkol'nom vozraste. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniia, T. 10, 1, 1-7.
  16. 16. El'konin, D. B. (1989). Izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy., 560. M.: Pedagogika.
  17. 17. Iudenkova, I. V. (2016). Vliianie otsenki uchitelia na formirovanie samootsenki mladshikh shkol'nikov. Molodoi uchenyi, 19, 409-410.
  18. 18. Iurkevich, V. S. (2010). Sovremennye problemy raboty s odarennymi det'mi. Psikhologo-pedagogicheskie issledovaniia, T. 2, 5, 12.
  19. 19. Dwesk, C. S. (1999). Self theories. PA: Taylor and Francis.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.