Understanding of Riddles by the Types of «Description of Situations», «Description of Signs», «Description of Functional Signs» by Third-Grade Students with Severe Speech Disorders

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-98163
Open Access
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychological and Pedagogical Support of General, Special and Inclusive Education of Children and Adults»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
International Research-to-practice conference «Psychological and Pedagogical Support of General, Special and Inclusive Education of Children and Adults»
Author:
Oksana M. Kovalenko 1
Work direction:
Problems of psychological safety of the environment in the system of special and inclusive education
Pages:
365-377
Received: 29 March 2021

Rating:
Article accesses:
1667
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
For citation:
Kovalenko O. M. (2021). Understanding of Riddles by the Types of «Description of Situations», «Description of Signs», «Description of Functional Signs» by Third-Grade Students with Severe Speech Disorders. Psychological and Pedagogical Support of General, Special and Inclusive Education of Children and Adults, 365-377. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-98163

Abstract

В статье рассматриваются особенности понимания некоторых видов загадок учащимися третьих классов с тяжёлыми нарушениями речи.

References

  1. 1. Калягин В.А. Логопсихология: учеб. пособие для студ. высш. учеб. заведений / В.А. Калягин, Т.С. Овчинникова. – М.: Академия, 2006. – 320 с.
  2. 2. Коваленко О.М. Понимание загадок учащимися третьих классов с общим недоразвитием речи (III уровень речевого развития) / О.М. Коваленко // Сборник тезисов XV научно-практической конференции студентов, аспирантов и молодых учёных. – М.: ОАН ОВО «МПСУ». – С. 97–105.

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.