Psychological and pedagogical conditions for the support of gifted children on the experience of a private lyceum named after G.V. and N.G. Riumin of Ryazan

Proceeding
DOI: 10.31483/r-75172
Open Access
All-Russian research-to-practice conference with international participation «Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Talented Children: Problems, Directions, Approaches, Conditions»
Creative commons logo
Published in:
All-Russian research-to-practice conference with international participation «Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Talented Children: Problems, Directions, Approaches, Conditions»
Authors:
Julia V. Shiltsova 1 , Lyudmila I. Arkharova 1 , Larisa M. Korchagina 1
Work direction:
Обучение, воспитание и развитие одаренных детей в образовательных учреждениях разного типа
Pages:
136-142
Received: 2 April 2020

Rating:
Article accesses:
2905
Published in:
РИНЦ
1 Ryazan State University
For citation:
Shiltsova J. V., Arkharova L. I., & Korchagina L. M. (2020). Psychological and pedagogical conditions for the support of gifted children on the experience of a private lyceum named after G.V. and N.G. Riumin of Ryazan. Psychological and Pedagogical Support of Talented Children: Problems, Directions, Approaches, Conditions, 136-142. Чебоксары: PH "Sreda". https://doi.org/10.31483/r-75172

Abstract

The experience of psychological and pedagogical support of gifted children, which consists mainly in the creation of certain conditions in a private educational institution is presented in the article. On the basis of a private lyceum named after G.V. and N.G. Riumin of Ryazan, created by the founder N.V. Riumin – candidate of psychological sciences and by its director L.I. Arkharova – candidate of pedagogical sciences, head of the Pedagogy and Teacher Education Department at FSBEI of HE " Ryazan State University named for S. Yesenin", the experience of cooperation of higher education and general education institutions in the formation and upbringing of gifted children has been studied. L.I. Arkharova’s psychological and pedagogical competencies and long experience enabled to create the conditions for attracting the best teachers of Ryazan. Being rather a small city, when the teachers of the FSBEI of HE " Ryazan State University named for S. Yesenin" know the best of the best by sight, teach the potential teachers a worthy education and “see” the situation from the inside, close cooperation and interaction can be observed. Entering the lyceum, children individually reveal their potential being surrounded by care, warmth, love and attention to the personality of everyone.

References

  1. 1. Bondarevskaia, E. V. (2000). Teoriia i praktika lichnostno orientirovannogo obrazovaniia., 351. Rostov n/D.
  2. 2. Gukalenko, O. V., & Kolokolova, I. V. (2001). Pedagogicheskaia podderzhka v polikul'turnom obrazovanii: innovatsionnye tekhnologii., 169. Tiraspol'.
  3. 3. Gazman, O. S. (2002). Neklassicheskoe vospitanie: Ot avtoritarnoi pedagogiki k pedagogike svobody., 296. M.: Miros.
  4. 4. Novichkova, V. B. (2002). Detskaia odarennost' kak tsel', sredstvo i rezul'tat obrazovatel'noi praktiki., 204. M.
  5. 5. Zadorina, E. N. (1994). Osobennosti tvorcheskogo i intellektual'nogo razvitiia odarionnykh shkol'nikov (v muzykal'noi i matematicheskoi shkolakh): Avtoref. dis., 22. M.
  6. 6. Lazarev, V. A. (2005). Pedagogicheskoe soprovozhdenie odarennykh starsheklassnikov., 33. Iaroslavl'.
  7. 7. Kulemzina, A. V. (2004). Odarennyi rebenok kak tsennost' sovremennye pedagogiki., 264. M.: KMK-press.
  8. 8. Shadrikova, V. D., Babaeva, Iu. D., Brushlinskii, A. V., Druzhinin, V. N., & Bogoiavlenskaia, D. B. (2003). Rabochaia kontseptsiia odarennosti., 95. M.
  9. 9. Savenkov, A. I. (2010). Psikhologiia detskoi odarennosti., 362-419. M.: Genezis.
  10. 10. Sait litseia imeni G.V. I N.G. Riuminykh. Retrieved from http://ruminsky-lyceum.github.io/

Comments(0)

When adding a comment stipulate:
  • the relevance of the published material;
  • general estimation (originality and relevance of the topic, completeness, depth, comprehensiveness of topic disclosure, consistency, coherence, evidence, structural ordering, nature and the accuracy of the examples, illustrative material, the credibility of the conclusions;
  • disadvantages, shortcomings;
  • questions and wishes to author.